This is a bit of a pet issue. the original patch introduced a regression
(text suddenly got flipped upside down because of the way it was saved and
the way kicad restricted text angles), that later was fixed, but the fix
only worked correctly for files created before the change (regression) was
int
Yes, this needs to be fixed.
On 02/12/2018 07:04 PM, Michael Kavanagh wrote:
I think the docs need to be updated to reflect these changes:
http://docs.kicad-pcb.org/doxygen/md_Documentation_development_compiling.html#build_osx
Cheers,
Michael
On 31 January 2018 at 15:24, Wayne Stambaugh
Updated patch.
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 9:41 AM Wayne Stambaugh
wrote:
> On 02/12/2018 05:21 PM, Russell Oliver wrote:
> > So a file created on disk in the project folder that is then added as a
> > path in the project specification?
>
> Yes. Just set m_PageLayoutDescrFileName to empty.kicad_wks
I think the docs need to be updated to reflect these changes:
http://docs.kicad-pcb.org/doxygen/md_Documentation_development_compiling.html#build_osx
Cheers,
Michael
On 31 January 2018 at 15:24, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> OK, these patches have be reduced to historical footnotes. Thanks
> everyo
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 02:14:41PM -0500, Kevin Cozens wrote:
> On 2018-02-12 12:52 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> >Obviously I did not get the stable 5 branch created over the weekend. I
> >was busy patch reviewing and merging.
> [snip]> I should be able to get v5 branched this weekend so going for
On 02/12/2018 05:21 PM, Russell Oliver wrote:
> So a file created on disk in the project folder that is then added as a
> path in the project specification?
Yes. Just set m_PageLayoutDescrFileName to empty.kicad_wks for both the
schematic and the board BASE_SCREEN objects and you should be good t
So a file created on disk in the project folder that is then added as a
path in the project specification?
As a more general concept then should every project have a layout file in
the project folder?
On 13 Feb 2018 02:59, "Wayne Stambaugh" wrote:
I prefer adding an empty.kicad_wks file be ad
On 2018-02-12 12:52 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
Obviously I did not get the stable 5 branch created over the weekend. I
was busy patch reviewing and merging.
[snip]> I should be able to get v5 branched this weekend so going forward we
have a few bugs tagged for rc2 which I'm hoping take less th
Obviously I did not get the stable 5 branch created over the weekend. I
was busy patch reviewing and merging. If could get some help from the
lead developers with this, it would free some time so I could finish up
the last few things on my todo list before the v5 branch.
One issue I would like f
Thanks Steven & JP, those are perfect.
Cheers,
Jeff.
> On 12 Feb 2018, at 17:23, Steven A. Falco wrote:
>
> On 02/12/2018 12:05 PM, Jeff Young wrote:
>> I want to test the progress reporter for zones to make sure I didn’t break
>> anything.
>>
>> Anyone have a file with a bunch of zones that
On 02/12/2018 12:05 PM, Jeff Young wrote:
> I want to test the progress reporter for zones to make sure I didn’t break
> anything.
>
> Anyone have a file with a bunch of zones that isn’t quite as diabolical as
> JP’s WRS?
I have one with 7 zones or so in this folder:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh
I want to test the progress reporter for zones to make sure I didn’t break
anything.
Anyone have a file with a bunch of zones that isn’t quite as diabolical as JP’s
WRS?
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-deve
I prefer adding an empty.kicad_wks file be added to the project and then
set the board and schematic worksheets to this file. This would negate
the file format rev bumps.
On 2/12/2018 10:48 AM, Maciej Sumiński wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> You are right, it adds a special case for project file format
Hi Russell,
You are right, it adds a special case for project file format, so
technically it is a version bump. Alternatively one could simply create
"empty.kicad_wks" and store there the contents of emptyPageLayout[]. It
seems safer, but on the other hand I would like to be able to specify
that d
Hi Russell,
On 02/11/2018 05:41 AM, Russell Oliver wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've discovered the cause of a problem when importing Eagle Projects and
> getting the schematic and boards synced.
>
> Currently when importing an Eagle schematic, labels for nets that are only
> found one Eagle sheet are i
Thank you Russell, I have just pushed your patch.
Regards,
Orson
On 02/11/2018 03:55 AM, Russell Oliver wrote:
> This fixes an issue i found during some testing. Small labels are added to
> connect segments sharing the same net name in the eagle schematic. These
> were placed in the middle of a w
16 matches
Mail list logo