On 21 February 2018 at 05:19, Ouabache Designworks wrote:
>
> Does Kicad have anyone working with these folks?
>
> Found this on semiwiki.com
>
>
> Hemant enthusiastically replied, “We encourage anyone interested in
> improving board design processes to join the consortium – there is no fee,
> and
Standardizing IPC-2581 is one thing. But I'm going to be realistic and say
it'll take another decade before fabs actually upgrade to software
supporting it if they even care.
Many write custom software or scripts for their workflow as they hire a guy
to do it part time. Other just use the cheapest
Does it make sense to predict whether a loading/progress window is
necessary based on total file size, based on prediction that a certain size
takes X seconds to load?
Or is loading highly dependent on the data/objects being loaded?
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 7:21 PM, Jon Evans wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
Hi all,
This patch adds the progress reporter dialog to GerbView file loading, when
loading multiple files and the total load time goes over 1 second. I've
also done some refactoring to share code between loading multiple files via
a gerber job file and via the regular open dialog.
-Jon
From d96
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 4:20 PM, Jeff Young wrote:
> > Maybe we should submit the kicad board file for acceptance as the
> standard. ;)
>
> It’s actually not a bad idea. My board house takes Gerbers or Kicad, and
> nothing else.
>
> Plus, it’s open source, which standards bodies like. (But even
On 02/20/2018 07:20 PM, Jeff Young wrote:
> Maybe we should submit the kicad board file for acceptance as the
standard. ;)
It’s actually not a bad idea. My board house takes Gerbers or Kicad,
and nothing else.
Plus, it’s open source, which standards bodies like. (But even
commercial stuf
> Maybe we should submit the kicad board file for acceptance as the standard. ;)
It’s actually not a bad idea. My board house takes Gerbers or Kicad, and
nothing else.
Plus, it’s open source, which standards bodies like. (But even commercial
stuff can become a standard — I was part of the tea
Patches merged! Keep up the great work!
Thanks,
Wayne
On 02/20/2018 10:43 AM, Jeff Young wrote:
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-d
Standards always seem like a good idea on the surface but they don't
seem to work as well in practice. On thing that is certain, gerber is
still the defacto standard for having boards manufactured. Lover or
hate em, they are not going anywhere any time soon. Of the few board
houses that I us
Yippee, build fixed!
Project KiCad (Windows, MSYS2) Nightly Build build #203: FIXED in 30 min:
http://darine.hogyros.de:8080/job/windows-kicad-msys2/203/
2018-02-20 20:33 GMT+01:00 Maciej Suminski :
> Apologies, it should be fine now.
>
> Cheers,
> Orson
>
> On 02/20/2018 08:09 PM, Wayne Stambaug
I fixed this and updated the contributor list. Thanks for the heads up.
On 2/16/2018 11:40 AM, Kevin Cozens wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> Some time ago one of the messages to this mailing list made me look at
> the AUTHORS.txt file. It says "See also CHANGELOG.txt for contributors."
> but there is no
Apologies, it should be fine now.
Cheers,
Orson
On 02/20/2018 08:09 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> Me too! Orson, can you please take a look at this when you get a chance.
>
> On 2/20/2018 12:10 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
>> Ok, but it seems to break the msys2 build.
>>
>> http://darine.hogyros.d
Me too! Orson, can you please take a look at this when you get a chance.
On 2/20/2018 12:10 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote:
> Ok, but it seems to break the msys2 build.
>
> http://darine.hogyros.de:8080/job/windows-kicad-msys2/202/console
>
> *17:58:19*
> C:/msys64/mingw32/lib/python2.7/site-packag
Looks like they have corporate and individual memberships. Individual is
free and probably has no vote. Corp probably costs $$ but gives you a
ballot.
It would be nice if Kicad had an official rep that could attend meetings,
propose rules and vote. At least that way we would know where we differed
Ok, but it seems to break the msys2 build.
http://darine.hogyros.de:8080/job/windows-kicad-msys2/202/console
*17:58:19*
C:/msys64/mingw32/lib/python2.7/site-packages/wx-3.0-msw/wx/_core.py:16633:
UserWarning: wxPython/wxWidgets release number mismatch*17:58:19*
warnings.warn("wxPython/wxWidgets
Ok, committed with a message explaining the possible solutions.
Cheers,
Orson
On 02/20/2018 03:22 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> Orson,
>
> You should just be able to turn of the wxPython scripting. All of the
> other scripting should work fine unless someone changed something that
> drags in wxP
On 2018-02-20 11:19 AM, Ouabache Designworks wrote:
Does Kicad have anyone working with these folks?
[snip]
http://www.ipc2581.com/articles-and-blogs/
I took a look at the website. It sounds interesting but they don't have a
lot of information available on the site. Part of what I see is wh
I merged this patch. Thank you Michael and Jeff for all of your
contributions.
Cheers,
Wayne
On 2/20/2018 10:19 AM, Jeff Young wrote:
> Update, rebased, warmed-over and spruced-up patch:
>
>
>
>
>
>> On 20 Feb 2018, at 14:02, Jeff Young wrote:
>>
>> He he… no worries.
>>
>> I’ll get to it
I don't think anything in that regard has changed since:
https://lists.launchpad.net/kicad-developers/msg20588.html
2018-02-20 17:19 GMT+01:00 Ouabache Designworks :
>
> Does Kicad have anyone working with these folks?
>
> Found this on semiwiki.com
>
>
> Hemant enthusiastically replied, *“We en
Does Kicad have anyone working with these folks?
Found this on semiwiki.com
Hemant enthusiastically replied, *“We encourage anyone interested in
improving board design processes to join the consortium – there is no fee,
and no contracts. There are both corporate and associate levels of
membershi
Jon,
I merged your patch.
Thanks,
Wayne
On 2/18/2018 7:01 PM, Jon Evans wrote:
> Hi Wayne,
>
> In my testing there is no performance impact, but more testing is
> welcome. It shouldn't be doing the calculation on too many objects in
> general, since this is a "second pass" hit test that appli
0007-Stop-nagging-me-about-unconnected-zones.patch
Description: Binary data
0008-Stop-nagging-me-about-annotating.patch
Description: Binary data
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.n
Update, rebased, warmed-over and spruced-up patch:
0004-New-menu-structure-for-ModEdit.patch
Description: Binary data
> On 20 Feb 2018, at 14:02, Jeff Young wrote:
>
> He he… no worries.
>
> I’ll get to it as soon as I finish the
> zone-creation-tool-not-respecting-45º-mode bug.
>
>
>> O
Hey Jeff,
And it just got more complicated. Orson, just pushed one of Michael's
patches which created a merge conflict with this patch. Would you
please rebase it and resubmit when you get a chance so I can get it merged.
Thanks,
Wayne
On 2/20/2018 7:44 AM, Jeff Young wrote:
> Hi Wayne,
>
>
He he… no worries.
I’ll get to it as soon as I finish the
zone-creation-tool-not-respecting-45º-mode bug.
> On 20 Feb 2018, at 13:59, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>
> Hey Jeff,
>
> And it just got more complicated. Orson, just pushed one of Michael's
> patches which created a merge conflict with
Andrey Kuznetsov kirjoitti 19/02/18 klo 03:59:
> Front Pads
> Bottom Pads
> -
> Front Text
> Bottom Text
> -
> etc
Please also keep track on consistent naming... Top-Bottom or Front-Back.
There used to be a convention which pair to use.
-Vesa
Orson,
You should just be able to turn of the wxPython scripting. All of the
other scripting should work fine unless someone changed something that
drags in wxPython when only the KICAD_SCRIPTING option is enabled.
Cheers,
Wayne
On 2/20/2018 2:40 AM, Maciej Sumiński wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> Than
Hi Wayne,
All the revisions were indeed getting too complicated. I’ve rolled all the
uncommitted changes into a single patch:
0004-New-menu-structure-for-ModEdit.patch
Description: Binary data
> On 19 Feb 2018, at 23:35, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>
> Please queue the patches up for me. I ha
Thank you Michael, the menu indeed looks better with your changes. I
have pushed your patch to the master branch.
Cheers,
Orson
On 02/20/2018 01:40 AM, Michael Kavanagh wrote:
> Minor modification. Sorry for the noise.
>
> On 19 February 2018 at 23:07, Michael Kavanagh
> wrote:
>> Here are the
29 matches
Mail list logo
