Hi Tom,
I’m happy to do it. Do I have your latest changes?
Cheers,
Jeff.
> On 24 Sep 2018, at 19:54, Tomasz Wlostowski wrote:
>
> On 24/09/18 20:07, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>> Hey Jeff,
>>
>> On 9/21/2018 9:49 AM, Jeff Young wrote:
>>> Hi Tom,
>>>
>>> Do you have additional fixes that are n
On 24/09/18 20:07, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> Hey Jeff,
>
> On 9/21/2018 9:49 AM, Jeff Young wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> Do you have additional fixes that are not in your branch of my repo?
>>
>> If not, does it make sense for me to rebase it on master? (It would have to
>> become “truth” at that poin
On 9/24/2018 1:07 PM, Seth Hillbrand wrote:
>
>
> Am Mo., 24. Sep. 2018 um 06:20 Uhr schrieb Thomas Pointhuber
> mailto:thomas.pointhu...@gmx.at>>:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would consider merging Python3 into 5.1 mandatory now, after the
> following comment (It seems like Fedora 29 will ship K
Am Mo., 24. Sep. 2018 um 11:09 Uhr schrieb Wayne Stambaugh <
stambau...@gmail.com>:
> From the testing I've done, this seems ready for wider user testing. I
> think we ( and by we I mean you and Tom ;) ) should start preparing to
> merge this into the development branch. I'm guessing giving the
Hey Jeff,
On 9/21/2018 9:49 AM, Jeff Young wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> Do you have additional fixes that are not in your branch of my repo?
>
> If not, does it make sense for me to rebase it on master? (It would have to
> become “truth” at that point, but you could clone back from it.)
>
> Cheers,
>
Am Mo., 24. Sep. 2018 um 06:20 Uhr schrieb Thomas Pointhuber <
thomas.pointhu...@gmx.at>:
> Hi,
>
> I would consider merging Python3 into 5.1 mandatory now, after the
> following comment (It seems like Fedora 29 will ship KiCad without
> scripting support enabled due to Python2 dependency):
> * ht
On 9/24/2018 10:20 AM, Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 24.09.2018 16:15, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>
>> Does this affect the 5.0 branch as well?
>
> No, it's a fixup for Orson's "Refactored logic in Spice model editor
> dialog" change, which isn't in the 5.0 branch.
>
>Simon
Simon,
I merge
Hi,
On 24.09.2018 16:15, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> Does this affect the 5.0 branch as well?
No, it's a fixup for Orson's "Refactored logic in Spice model editor
dialog" change, which isn't in the 5.0 branch.
Simon
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Simon,
Does this affect the 5.0 branch as well?
Cheers,
Wayne
On 9/24/2018 8:49 AM, Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> patch ping: this is a trivial change, dialog_spice_model.cpp needs
> for std::toupper.
>
>Simon
>
> On 22.09.2018 22:32, Simon Richter wrote:
>> ---
>> eeschema/dialogs/di
Hi,
I would consider merging Python3 into 5.1 mandatory now, after the
following comment (It seems like Fedora 29 will ship KiCad without
scripting support enabled due to Python2 dependency):
* https://github.com/KiCad/fedora-packaging/pull/20#issuecomment-423963638
It seems there is still Python
If it would like the optional python3 support in 5.1, I think it makes
sense to rebase and merge now on master.
On Thu, 20 Sep 2018 at 18:06, Seth Hillbrand wrote:
>
> I've done some basic tests on Mac with current packaging and doesn't seem to
> break anything. Tested footprint generation and a
Hi,
patch ping: this is a trivial change, dialog_spice_model.cpp needs
for std::toupper.
Simon
On 22.09.2018 22:32, Simon Richter wrote:
> ---
> eeschema/dialogs/dialog_spice_model.cpp | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
12 matches
Mail list logo
