Or instead of trying to change how the ratsnests are displayed because they
are laying on top of each other, instead have the user hover over the
overlapping of nets and a popup appears showing what nets there are kind of
like a magnifying glass, would probably be better if this magnifying glass
is
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 08:25:01AM -0800, Evan Shultz wrote:
> As nothing more than an example, here is another tool facing the same
> issue. I've colored one net's ratsnest green (others are still blue) and
> you can see pins at orthogonal locations to each other get a zig (or is
> that a zag?) so
That pretty much the way I see it. Being able to configure the ratsnest
lines make life easier for very complex boards.
Wayne
On 2/13/19 7:06 PM, Brian Piccioni wrote:
> Wayne
>
> On reflection it occurred to me that being able to vary the width of a
> ratsnest by net (or perhaps netclass) may
On 2/13/19 7:35 PM, Andy Peters wrote:
>
>
>> On Feb 13, 2019, at 5:06 PM, Brian Piccioni
>> wrote:
>>
>> Wayne
>>
>> On reflection it occurred to me that being able to vary the width of a
>> ratsnest by net (or perhaps netclass) may provide additional utility to
>> being able to vary colou
> On Feb 13, 2019, at 5:06 PM, Brian Piccioni
> wrote:
>
> Wayne
>
> On reflection it occurred to me that being able to vary the width of a
> ratsnest by net (or perhaps netclass) may provide additional utility to being
> able to vary colour by net.
>
> Like bolding of text, it would make
Wayne
On reflection it occurred to me that being able to vary the width of a ratsnest
by net (or perhaps netclass) may provide additional utility to being able to
vary colour by net.
Like bolding of text, it would make certain nets stand out. For example, +5V
might be red, +5V main buss might
As nothing more than an example, here is another tool facing the same
issue. I've colored one net's ratsnest green (others are still blue) and
you can see pins at orthogonal locations to each other get a zig (or is
that a zag?) so the individual pins on the net can still be easily
identified.
[imag
We probably should spin a rc2. I was planning on using Tom's GAL canvas
fixes as the base line for rc2 so as soon as he gets that merged, we
should start thinking about it. Hopefully this will be soon. My goal
is still to get 5.1.0 out by then end of February if at all possible.
On 2/13/2019 4:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 2:28 PM Jeff Young wrote:
>
> >> I'm also not
> >> completely sure curved air wires will be necessary once we implement the
> >> coloring feature.
>
> I wonder if this is a digital vs. discrete thing? With transistors in
> particular, I often find several ratsnest lines g
Hi Wayne,
Ratsnest thickness and scroll config can be added as advanced config,
and proper UI introduced after 5.1 (and backported to 5.1.1 if
wanted?).
Cheers,
John
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 12:50 PM Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
>
> I'm fine with adding a ratsnest line thickness option. I can sympat
>> I'm also not
>> completely sure curved air wires will be necessary once we implement the
>> coloring feature.
I wonder if this is a digital vs. discrete thing? With transistors in
particular, I often find several ratsnest lines going directly over the 3 pins,
and having no idea which one con
I'm fine with adding a ratsnest line thickness option. I can sympathize
with the old guy eyesight problem.
On 2/12/2019 10:07 AM, Brian Piccioni wrote:
> For what it is worth, I would love to have the ability to change the
> "thickness" of ratsnest wires. I find them almost invisible when there a
Should we create a 5.1.0-rc2 milestone or should we just use 5.1.0 if we
think something needs to be included?
On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 19:52, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> I'm going to tag 5.1.0-rc1 this evening after I get home from work.
> There are still two low priority bugs against the 5.1.0-rc1 m
13 matches
Mail list logo
