I would have thought that any discussion of performance would have to take
the speed of the diskio into account
executing: (if you get command not found then install the sysstat package)
$iostat -h -x -d 2
whilst compiling would show the diskio utilization factor (last column), if
it is pegged
Nick
Thanks for the lead. I am not very advanced on this stuff so if you can direct
me to an “Idiots Guide to Compiling Kicad with Microsoft Studio” if such a
thing exists I’d appreciate it.
I got geographic re-annotation working in a standalone app and now I’m trying
to integrate it with
I think we are derailing this thread by discussion this here. Lets not
keep doing that. Please start a new thread if you want support with
that.
On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 at 00:27, Brian Piccioni
wrote:
>
> Nick
>
>
>
> Thanks for the lead. I am not very advanced on this stuff so if you can
> direct
Hello Brian
You would still need to obtain the dependencies in some way. vcpkg
seems popular, but I still think there are issues with wxwidgets and
vcpkg and some other dependencies kicad require to enable all features
are not easily available.
On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 at 22:28, Brian Piccioni
Tomasz
Do you use Visual Studio to compile Kicad? If so, how? I’m not very good with
things like cmake and I’ve tried and tried to get KiCad (or even just PCBNew)
to compile with Visual Studio and end up with various problems I can’t solve
like missing packages, etc..
Besides the debugger,
On 29/10/2019 15:40, Simon Richter wrote:
> We could probably shave off another two or three minutes of build time if
> we could make sure that we always make progress on the critical path. The
> dependency generation as a side effect pulls all the sources and headers
> into cache, which reduces
How would one plot, for example, the difference between two vectors?
I tried this in a text box:
.save foo=(‘v(/input)-v(/output2)’)
.tran 10u 50m
but "foo" does not show up in the list of vectors to display in the plot window.
Another thing, I found that one can use parameters for values, for
Ha, I also keep around my Thinkpad T61 for occasional testing for this
purpose, although usually I avoid building on it as that takes a lonng
time.
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 10:57 AM Drew Van Zandt
wrote:
> Let me encourage some of y'all to stick with an older machine, or keep it
> around for
Let me encourage some of y'all to stick with an older machine, or keep it
around for testing... the latest build of KiCAD is noticeably laggy on my
machine, which is not terribly fast (but also not that old). It makes some
of the bugs I have reported worse, and their fixes have been pushed out to
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 10:20:45PM -0700, Andrew Lutsenko wrote:
> I kinda expected 2x maybe 3x decrease because not all computations scale
> linearly with number of threads. I was pleasantly surprised by almost 6x
> decrease in clean build time and 5x in incremental builds.
FWIW, we have a
Thanks for this data! I also have a Haswell system right now and have been
eyeing the new Ryzens... I too feel the pain of long kicad compilation
time.
-Jon
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019, 01:51 Henner Zeller wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 22:21, Andrew Lutsenko
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> This
11 matches
Mail list logo
