Good-to-know knowledge. Thanks for the education, Javier.
So if I do some minor changes to some file with "Copyright John Smith 2017"
and since it is minor I don't even bother adding a second line there, does
it imply "I'm passing my copyright ownership to John Smith" or actually the
copyright hol
or use boost::variant and switch to std::variant in the future?
On 28 June 2017 at 00:18, hauptmech wrote:
> The tokens for circles are fine.
>
> I suspect it will come up about as often as it has (so once in 5 years?).
>
> Perhaps you could a couple lines of documentation for fp_arc in the file
://docs.kicad-pcb.org/doxygen/md_Documentation_
> development_coding-style-policy.html
>
> On 6/6/2017 8:17 AM, Cheng Sheng wrote:
> > Thanks, Wayne. See the new attachment with "wxURL" for testing URLs and
> > updated AUTHORS.txt. Retested that both cases (http://... and
>
you work
> for.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Wayne
>
> [1]:
> http://docs.wxwidgets.org/3.0/classwx_u_r_l.html#
> a9837df16ff9f8daf91e5569265cfbe60
>
> On 5/31/2017 5:43 PM, Cheng Sheng wrote:
> > I see. This is also doable. I updated the patch to resolve en
orks, hence I would have
> assumed it would aslo for for other paths. Maybe that is a better
> solution in this case to keep things consistent.
>
> 2017-05-31 17:39 GMT+02:00 Cheng Sheng :
> > Hi Nick,
> >
> > Could you be a little more specific? Do you mean:
> >
>
ing the KIPRJMOD as is?
>
> 2017-05-31 15:17 GMT+02:00 Cheng Sheng :
> > Thanks, Fabrizio. It's good to know such info that is not mentioned in
> the
> > doc. I'm indeed quite new to contributing code here.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Cheng
> >
> &
in and what stays out. And normally common good is paramount.
>
> cheers
> Fabrizio
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:49 AM, Cheng Sheng
> wrote:
>
>> okay, thanks for the info, Sergey.
>>
>> Don't find any explicit rule on ho
itioning. Thanks.
Regards,
Cheng
On 31 May 2017 at 11:01, Sergey A. Borshch
wrote:
> On 31.05.2017 10:57, Cheng Sheng wrote:
>
>> So is there any conclusion on this patch like it will be accepted or
>> rejected or needs some improvement?
>>
>> Sergey, are you a patch
So is there any conclusion on this patch like it will be accepted or
rejected or needs some improvement?
Sergey, are you a patch reviewer who can commit to the repo, or I need to
add someone explicitly? Thanks.
Regards,
Cheng
On May 29, 2017 12:33 PM, "Cheng Sheng" wrote:
On 29 M
On 29 May 2017 at 09:40, Sergey A. Borshch
wrote:
> On 28.05.2017 23:49, Cheng Sheng wrote:
>
>> I myself prefer storing all files specific to the project within the
>> project directory, including datasheets, components, adjusted footprints
>> and scripts. This way ma
based on my own workflow.
Regards,
Cheng
On 28 May 2017 at 20:53, Ingo Kletti wrote:
> Am 28.05.2017 um 18:47 schrieb Sergey A. Borshch:
>
>> On 28.05.2017 14:35, Cheng Sheng wrote:
>>
>>> So I made a patch to resolve the path before it is passed to
>>> "w
To Simon: Fair. It is indeed a little odd that C++ committee decides to put
one before but one after the signature. Only that you might want to write
it in the style guide; otherwise, both styles will appear in the future.
To Mark: I said {the use of both is redundant}, not {one of them is
redunda
Why both "virtual" and "override" in "struct C"? It is redundant (you
cannot override a non-virtual function). See
http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/override.
Regards,
Cheng
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 1:27 AM, Simon Richter
wrote:
> Hi Wayne,
>
> On 12.07.2016 16:07, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
Random thought: Make some positive thing to subtract away.
1. What about drawing a small dot under each pad? It is surely subtracted
but you still have some positive images so you don't have a negative-only
film to be "corrected".
2. What about picking some empty region to add a dot then subtract i
Thanks for the hints, Tomasz!
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 11:47 PM, Tomasz Wlostowski <
tomasz.wlostow...@cern.ch> wrote:
> On 12.06.2016 20:06, Prabhu Sammandam wrote:
> > Hi Jean-Pierre,
> >
> > Yes I accept. Why I am bothering is that, it is wasting the toner.
> >
> > I need to take two prints and
okay... I didn't even notice that "Plot" can output pdf/ps directly!
Thought it was Gerber only.
Then this change can be skipped, indeed it doesn't add any new
functionality.
Thanks for the comments, guys.
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 6:44 PM, jp charras wrote:
> Le 12/06/2016 à 18:29, Prabhu Samma
16 matches
Mail list logo
