On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Lorenzo Marcantonio
l.marcanto...@logossrl.com wrote:
The idea is to have more legible net names on pads and tracks when using
light colours (it can happen using the net highlighting, as shown).
Any idea/comment?
The high-contrast net names look good. However,
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 7:45 PM, jp charras jp.char...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
I was aware of this lib (It comes from LibreCAD) but I did not found any doc
to use it (no document and no comments in sources)
Have you some doc?
No, I just stared at the code for a while. It seems that one has to
Hi,
Currently gerbers plotted from pcbnew approximate arcs and circles
using linear segments. I implemented circle and arc plotting using the
native gerber circular interpolation commands (G02/03) in the
multi-quadrant mode. The output looks good in gerbview and gerbv.
However, before committing
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 9:47 AM, jean-pierre charras
jp.char...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
Your commit about zone duplication has *very* serious issues and currently
breaks Pcbnew:
- No test is made, so a zone can be added to the same layer (duplicate zone
on same layers)
- No DRC performed on the new
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Александр Закамалдин zak...@mail.ru wrote:
This changes causes the compilation warnings 'comparison of signed and
unsigned integer expressions'.
It would be good to investigate this issue and fix it.
Fixed. Let me know if there are any GOST issues with the
There's now support for zone corner smoothing in pcbnew. However, an
issue remains with zones with cut-outs. Will be taken care of shortly.
marco
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to :
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 7:32 PM, jean-pierre charras
jp.char...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
What do you mean by fillet zone corners ?
I mean rounding corners.
I am thinking both KBool and Boost::polygon have functions to chamfer
polygons outlines. But I am not sure.
I think that the
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Wayne Stambaugh stambau...@verizon.net wrote:
It looks good. It certainly is a huge improvement over the old dialog. Aside
from some minor alignment issues the only comment I have is what does the
Apply Settings button do? If it just copies the dialog settings
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Jerry Jacobs
xor.gate.engineer...@gmail.com wrote:
For me the dialog is very very good, and works as expected. Still the issue
remains that the dialog can't be closed with the window button and the
cancel button. I hacked a class function DIALOG_PLOT_BASE::OnQuit
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Wayne Stambaugh stambau...@verizon.net wrote:
Desirable would have been a better term here. I am hoping to do away with the
drawn cross hairs and use the stock cross hairs cursor which will make this
behavior impossible.
The good thing about having the cursor
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 3:20 PM, jean-pierre charras
jp.char...@wanadoo.fr wrote:
Most of time plot subdirectory is a subdirectory of the current working
directory.
Mainly in this case (easy to detect), the stored path must be relative to
the CWD.
Do not forget the CWD can easily change for a
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Marco Mattila marco...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been rearranging the plot dialog. The current status is shown in
the attachment. There should be enough room to add a checkbox for
marking the path relative.
On second thought, it should be possible to infer from
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:21 AM, Dick Hollenbeck d...@softplc.com wrote:
Any complex string that is capable of having either whitespace or quotes
in it should be wrapped using
aFormatter-Quoted( CONV_TO_UTF8(blah) ).c_str(),
I'm working on this now. Should there be something like
if(
If there's more than one board in a project, the board file might more
suitable. It's the same thing with the plotting options that were
discussed earlier. However, I think that typically people have only
one board per project (?).
marco
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Wayne Stambaugh
Committed an edited version of this patch.
marco
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Marco Mattila marco...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm reposting this patch since the original has probably gone missing
due to a non-conformant subject line. The original discussion is in
this thread: https
Committed this patch (this time using bazaar branch nick testing, if
that makes any difference).
marco
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Marco Mattila marco...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
It seems that currently the clearances between zones and pcb edge
segments (and text items and module edge
Damn. I always struggle the most with the comments for Doxygen...
I think that we may be able to get rid of the global variable. I'll
take a look. I'll fix the comments in the next patch, too.
marco
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Wayne Stambaugh stambau...@verizon.net wrote:
This is a nice
If you think that the plotting requirements vary from one project to
another (the number of needed technical layers maybe?), saving them
outside the config system makes sense. Since there can be multiple
boards in a project, maybe the SETUP section of a board file is the
correct place for this. I
The previous patch has a bug. It incorrectly complains about no layers
being selected. This patch works better.
marco
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Marco Mattila marco...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
During previous discussions about subtracting masks from silkscreen
layers when plotting gerbers
Hi,
During previous discussions about subtracting masks from silkscreen
layers when plotting gerbers, Dick mentioned that saving plot settings
is not quite up to date. Currently some plot settings to be
saved/loaded are defined in pcbnew_config.cpp. However, that requires
that corresponding
Hi,
It seems that currently the clearances between zones and pcb edge
segments (and text items and module edge segments on copper layers)
are not something one would expect based on zone clearance settings.
The reason is that, unlike with, e.g., tracks, the minimum zone
thickness is not taken
Dick,
The main point in my reply earlier was just that the visual results
are not equivalent. However, I agree with you that using OR is the way
to go if it is acceptable that things in gerbview will look a little
different than before. At least I'm ok with that.
Anyways, I think that the
I tested the output with gerbview and gerbv. In gerbv everything's ok.
Now that I checked again with gerbview the negative layer kind of
works. However, since negative layers in gerbview are taken care of by
drawing them in background color, the negative stuff will be
subtracted from all layers
Ok, but what was the bug/issue that was fixed by introducing
m_oldRootName? Before 2559 it was possible to create a copy of a
component by changing the value field and clicking save. Replacing a
component was done by creating a copy first and then deleting the old
one. After introducing
This was changed in revision 2559. The reason was Fix bug that
prevented component from being replaced in library when the component
root name was changed. I don't quite get the point, though. What
exactly was the bug? Value != component name? Is there something that
could be done to enable
The attached version of the patch adds a checkbox into the block
operation dialog. The user can choose whether the items in the block
are drawn or not during the operation. That should be more suitable
than a compiled-in constant for users with different preferences.
Outline-only behavior is also
Do you mean useful from an aesthetic or screen refresh point of view?
Since selecting flip (in pcbnew) or mirror (in eeschema) after
(inadvertently) moving the block flips/mirrors the block in its
original position.
marco
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Lorenzo Marcantonio
, Sep 13, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Wayne Stambaugh stambau...@verizon.net wrote:
On 9/10/2010 9:19 AM, Marco Mattila wrote:
Hi,
Do you have any input regarding this patch proposal? Is there something that
should be done differently for this to be considered?
Marco,
I apologize for not responding sooner
for flip
block, though.
Marco
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 8:46 AM, jean-pierre charras
jp.char...@wanadoo.frwrote:
Le 17/10/2010 00:05, Marco Mattila a écrit :
Hi,
I have previously submitted a couple of patches that prevented direct
manipulation of locked modules in pcbnew. However, within a
block
So the dialog should be added to block flip, too. I'll start working on
this.
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 1:44 PM, jean-pierre charras
jp.char...@wanadoo.frwrote:
Le 17/10/2010 12:32, Marco Mattila a écrit :
Good point. However, sometimes it might be used also for moving footprints
within
Hi,
I have previously submitted a couple of patches that prevented direct
manipulation of locked modules in pcbnew. However, within a block it
remained possible to, e.g., move a locked module. This patch prevents locked
modules from being added to the list of selected items in a block operation.
Hi,
Moving of pads using hotkeys in pcbnew was found to be little problematic in
earlier discussions. The attached patch changes hotkey behavior so that
pressing M, G, or E over a pad moves, drags, or edits the parent footprint
(pads can still be moved via the right-click menu). The patch is a
Hi,
There seems to be a small typo in libeditframe.cpp that prevents block copy
via the right-click menu. This patch helps.
marco
=== modified file 'eeschema/libeditframe.cpp'
--- eeschema/libeditframe.cpp 2010-07-23 14:12:37 +
+++ eeschema/libeditframe.cpp 2010-09-01 20:47:27 +
@@
The issue here is that before hotkey moving of footprints, pads, and
fotprint text fields in pcbnew was implemented, it was always possible to
right click somewhere on the footprint and select move footprint on the
menu. Now that there are some hotkeys, one cannot just point at some point
on the
Hi,
I've attached a patch that allows reseting footprint reference or value text
sizes and widths to the defaults set in the Dimensions-Texts and Drawings
dialog. The functions Reset size and Reset all sizes are added into
Reference and Value submenus of the right-click context menu (not sure if
Sorry about the formatting issues (and double posting to you Dick). My emacs
c-style should now be correct for Kicad. However, the previous patch didn't
quite get fixed to that style yet. I think that this patch has no tabs or
extra whitespace. I also removed the superfluous else statements you
Hi,
Drawing component fields originating from templates crashes eeschema due to
a null parent issue. The attached patch fixes that.
Regards,
Marco
=== modified file 'eeschema/dialog_edit_component_in_schematic.cpp'
--- eeschema/dialog_edit_component_in_schematic.cpp 2010-07-12 14:07:09 +
Hi again,
I intend to use global labels to name power nets instead of power symbols,
and, thus, I made some changes to enable dragging of labels. Most of the
code should be pretty straightforward. The changes in dangling_ends.cpp make
dangling label detection work for all wire orientations and
38 matches
Mail list logo
