I've also noticed that zooming with the mouse wheel has a weird
acceleration in the opengl canvas. Works properly in the default one.
On 29 Dec 2014 06:43, "Andy Peters" wrote:
> OK, I am back to actually using Kicad for a design. I am on BZR 5337 on OS
> X 10.9.5. In no particular order:
>
> a)
It's quite a pain to get perl on Windows, and adding another dependency
makes building and distributing it more of a pain. You could maybe use
perlcc to convert it to C, but a manual line-by-line conversion would be
much better. Not difficult, just tedious.
On 9 December 2014 at 07:22, Lorenzo Mar
. Just for development where you have to recompile a
lot.
I'll try the cmake trick first though. 15s down to 1s is very good! I'm not
familiar with cmake - please could you tell me (roughly) how to persuade it?
Cheers,
Tim
On 22 Oct 2014 22:15, "Martijn Kuipers" wrote:
> Tim,
&g
Hi, I have previously used kicad-winbuilder successfully, but I just tried
it again (in a fresh directory) and get the error below. I tried it in a
much shorter path too and it still fails (and it worked with that path
before so I'm pretty sure it's not the path).
Anyone have any ideas?
Cheers,
oment so I will maybe have a go at changing it to
a dynamic one.
I might also try porting to QBS (Qt's new build system) which is much
faster than make in my experience.
Cheers,
Tim
On 22 October 2014 14:40, Tomasz Wlostowski
wrote:
> On 22.10.2014 15:01, Tim Hutt wrote:
>
>>
Hi,
I'm trying to do some kicad development on windows. I initially downloaded
& built it with kicad-winbuilder which went without a hitch. Kicad runs
fine.
However, if I perform a null-rebuild (i.e. I don't change anything and just
run `make` again), it takes about 70 seconds to run. That's quit
Or you could add another button to the toolbar which always bypasses the
dialog. (And add it to the menu too! I don't know why so many actions are
toolbar-only in kicad.)
On 22 October 2014 12:43, Sergey A. Borshch
wrote:
> Sorry, I've lost first message in topic from Mark, so I paste my one as
This is fantastic. It is one of the more confusing (and easy to fix!)
things about Kicad. I did a small survey of data sheets when a while ago to
see what they call them. There was some variety but footprint was the most
popular. I can't remember exactly but it was definitely used in more than
50%
On 10 September 2014 22:25, Javier Serrano
wrote:
> Assuming I have correctly understood what you mean (English is not my
> native language) I'd have to disagree with it. All the opinions I have read
> here seem to me as coming from people who are genuinely convinced of what
> they are saying. Ev
On 10 September 2014 20:57, Lorenzo Marcantonio
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 06:54:13PM +0100, Tim Hutt wrote:
>
> > 1. Good software has a manual. Great software doesn't need one.
>
> OK, then try set correctly some FPGA timing constraint without reading
> the
On 10 September 2014 20:48, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> On 9/10/2014 1:54 PM, Tim Hutt wrote:
> > On 10 September 2014 10:25, Javier Serrano
> > > <mailto:javier.serrano.par...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > There is a big difference between commercial pr
> Nick
>
>
> 2014-09-10 19:59 GMT+02:00 Tim Hutt :
>
>> It's fine to like weird UI options of course, and I would never consider
>> removing the option, but I still think they should be off by default. If
>> you (whoever is in charge!) absolutely insist that they
To be honest I have got used to the mouse warping in DesignSpark, but I
think it is Stockholm syndrome!
On 10 September 2014 18:14, Lorenzo Marcantonio
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 09:46:07AM -0700, Ouabache Designworks wrote:
> > Case in point you mentioned that warp to center on zoom was "
It's fine to like weird UI options of course, and I would never consider
removing the option, but I still think they should be off by default. If
you (whoever is in charge!) absolutely insist that they are on by default
then a Chrome-style info bar like this is pretty much essential IMO (shown
when
Hi,
I've been looking for a good free EDA software for ages, and currently use
Designspark PCB, which is freeware but not open source (although the only
limitation is an unobtrusive RS splash advert on startup). It is ok though
- and orders of magnitude better than Eagle. I tried gEDA years ago an
15 matches
Mail list logo
