Before we entertain the idea of pursuing this (I'm neither suggesting
that we should or shouldn't), what would be the harm in seeing if our
55K of CI pipeline is an issue? If it is, then we can discuss using an
Azure pipeline.
On 11/27/19 1:18 PM, Mark Roszko wrote:
> Honestly, it would be
Honestly, it would be awesome if we leveraged Azure Pipelines. For OSS it
provides *unlimited minutes of* *Windows, OSX,Linux builds with up to 10
parallel jobs at a time.*
Though the integration may not be as nice as it is with GitHub. But it
blows away just a single build box and the standard
On 11/27/19 6:14 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
On 11/27/19 6:28 AM, Simon Richter wrote:
Hi Seth,
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 12:54:31PM -0800, Seth Hillbrand wrote:
Wayne and the bot have permissions for the entire project. I'm
there while sorting out the transition work. Coding permissions are
On 11/27/19 6:28 AM, Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi Seth,
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 12:54:31PM -0800, Seth Hillbrand wrote:
>
>> Wayne and the bot have permissions for the entire project. I'm
>> there while sorting out the transition work. Coding permissions are
>> specific to
On 2019-11-27 03:28, Simon Richter wrote:
Hi Seth,
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 12:54:31PM -0800, Seth Hillbrand wrote:
Wayne and the bot have permissions for the entire project. I'm
there while sorting out the transition work. Coding permissions are
specific to https://gitlab.com/kicad/code/ .
Hi Seth,
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 12:54:31PM -0800, Seth Hillbrand wrote:
> Wayne and the bot have permissions for the entire project. I'm
> there while sorting out the transition work. Coding permissions are
> specific to https://gitlab.com/kicad/code/ . Library permissions
> are specific to
6 matches
Mail list logo
