e...@outlook.com>
> *Envoyé :* mardi 26 septembre 2017 21:56:07
> *À :* Wayne Stambaugh
> *Cc :* kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
> *Objet :* Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] Fix some performance issues
>
> Hi,
>
> Ok, I'll keep the patchset synchronized with the master
re the patches up to date.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Camille
> >
> >
> > *De :* Camille <camille...@outlook.com>
> > *Envoyé :* mardi 26 septembre 2017 21:56:07
> > *À :* Wayne Stambaugh
> > *Cc :* kicad-developers@list
Regards,
>
> Camille
>
>
> *De :* Camille <camille...@outlook.com>
> *Envoyé :* mardi 26 septembre 2017 21:56:07
> *À :* Wayne Stambaugh
> *Cc :* kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
> *Objet :* Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATC
On 9/26/2017 3:56 PM, Camille 019 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Ok, I'll keep the patchset synchronized with the master branch, for
> future inclusion. When will the feature freeze take effect ?
I was hoping it would be by the end of September but obviously that is
not going to happen. I have my symbol
Hi,
Ok, I'll keep the patchset synchronized with the master branch, for future
inclusion. When will the feature freeze take effect ?
I agree my patchset has no real impact on the performance. I mainly wanted to
test clang-tidy on a consistent source code base. I also think that keeping
On 9/25/2017 4:07 AM, Maciej Sumiński wrote:
> Hi Camille,
>
> I think the attached patches are sensible, even though I hope most
> compilers apply optimizations to avoid performance penalties whenever
> possible.
I agree although I'm not sure about the compiler optimization. A quick
look at
Hi Camille,
I think the attached patches are sensible, even though I hope most
compilers apply optimizations to avoid performance penalties whenever
possible.
If the attached patches are autogenerated, then I would kindly ask you
to generate them when we reach the feature freeze stage. There are
7 matches
Mail list logo
