Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] V5 upgrade documentation

2018-06-29 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
Thanks Nick! On 06/28/2018 06:00 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote: > I have put the upated image live now, and it seems to work. I will try > to revert the removal of the macros. > > Den tor. 28. jun. 2018 kl. 23.21 skrev Nick Østergaard > mailto:oe.n...@gmail.com>>: > > Hi Seth > > Ok, thank

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] V5 upgrade documentation

2018-06-29 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
Does this mean that we will be able to put the github macros back into the adoc file? I also checked the latest doc build and I did not see the version upgrade section in the kicad documentation as if the include statement failed. Any ideas or am I missing something? Wayne On 06/28/2018 05:21

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] V5 upgrade documentation

2018-06-29 Thread Marco Ciampa
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 12:00:21AM +0200, Nick Østergaard wrote: > I have put the upated image live now, and it seems to work. I will try to > revert the removal of the macros. > > Den tor. 28. jun. 2018 kl. 23.21 skrev Nick Østergaard : > > > Hi Seth > > > > Ok, thank you for your

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] V5 upgrade documentation

2018-06-28 Thread Nick Østergaard
I have put the upated image live now, and it seems to work. I will try to revert the removal of the macros. Den tor. 28. jun. 2018 kl. 23.21 skrev Nick Østergaard : > Hi Seth > > Ok, thank you for your investigation. I will update the docker image to > bionic which uses 0.52 of po4a. > > Nick >

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] V5 upgrade documentation

2018-06-28 Thread Nick Østergaard
Hi Seth Ok, thank you for your investigation. I will update the docker image to bionic which uses 0.52 of po4a. Nick Den tor. 28. jun. 2018 kl. 23.05 skrev Seth Hillbrand < seth.hillbr...@gmail.com>: > ​Bother. po4a fixed this back in 2016 ( >

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] V5 upgrade documentation

2018-06-28 Thread Seth Hillbrand
​Bother. po4a fixed this back in 2016 ( https://github.com/mquinson/po4a/commit/86f79e5d341ffcb62da9812101304c3dbb420cc6). It looks like our doc server is running 0.47 (the fix didn't get released until 0.49) -S Am Do., 28. Juni 2018 um 12:39 Uhr schrieb Wayne Stambaugh <

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] V5 upgrade documentation

2018-06-28 Thread Adam Wolf
No problem, thanks for everything! On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 2:38 PM Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > > Hey Adam, > > It will eventually be in the Kicad documentation at > > http://docs.kicad-pcb.org/stable/en/kicad.html > > There were some github macros that hauptmech added that broke the > documentation

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] V5 upgrade documentation

2018-06-28 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
Hey Adam, It will eventually be in the Kicad documentation at http://docs.kicad-pcb.org/stable/en/kicad.html There were some github macros that hauptmech added that broke the documentation build. Apparently asciidoc was choking on them which is unfortunate as they made the github adoc

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] V5 upgrade documentation

2018-06-28 Thread Adam Wolf
Hi Wayne, Has it been decided where this documentation will live? Is it some place with a URL? Thanks! Adam On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 11:24 AM Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > > hauptmech, > > I merged your patch and pushed the changes upstream to the kicad doc > repo. Thank you for the help with the

Re: [Kicad-developers] [PATCH] V5 upgrade documentation

2018-06-24 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
hauptmech, I merged your patch and pushed the changes upstream to the kicad doc repo. Thank you for the help with the documentation. Cheers, Wayne On 06/23/2018 08:54 PM, hauptmech wrote: > > Attached > > On 24/06/18 02:46, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: >> Hey hauptmech >> >> For the most part I'm

[Kicad-developers] [PATCH] V5 upgrade documentation

2018-06-23 Thread hauptmech
Attached On 24/06/18 02:46, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: Hey hauptmech For the most part I'm fine with these changes. I think that the first two paragraphs (sentences) in the "Schematic Symbol Libraries" section of the version upgrade document could be merged into a single paragraph since they are