Re: [Kicad-developers] [RFC] new connectivity algorithm - testers needed

2017-11-14 Thread Tomasz Wlostowski
On 14/11/17 11:50, miles mccoo wrote: > I do see that the implementation of GetPadCount(aNet) does just that.[3] > Also, in that implementation, it's referencing connAlgo's padList. Is > this better than asking board for its pads? I'm thinking the whole > "don't repeat yourself" thing [4] Would

Re: [Kicad-developers] [RFC] new connectivity algorithm - testers needed

2017-11-14 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
BOARD_CONNECTED_ITEM::GetNet()? On 11/14/2017 5:50 AM, miles mccoo wrote: > > > old thread, but I think it's relevant to my issue. My interest is mostly > in the python interface to pcbnew.[0] > > > With the new connectivity stuff, what's the proper way to ask a net what > pads belong to it?

Re: [Kicad-developers] [RFC] new connectivity algorithm - testers needed

2017-11-14 Thread miles mccoo
old thread, but I think it's relevant to my issue. My interest is mostly in the python interface to pcbnew.[0] With the new connectivity stuff, what's the proper way to ask a net what pads belong to it? In python, I used to be able to do net.Pads() [1] I tried adding connectivity.h[2] to

Re: [Kicad-developers] [RFC] new connectivity algorithm - testers needed

2017-07-03 Thread Kristoffer Ödmark
Hey Tom! Any ETA for the new Via tool dialog? It's some solid work you have done, thanks! - Kristoffer On 2017-06-27 21:54, Tomasz Wlostowski wrote: On 27.06.2017 21:24, Simon Küppers wrote: Small Bump. Can anyone shed some light on the new Via Tool? Is it supposed to be not ready yet?

Re: [Kicad-developers] [RFC] new connectivity algorithm - testers needed

2017-06-30 Thread easyw
Hi Orson, tested with latest commits and now is fine. thanks a lot Maurice On 6/30/2017 9:46 PM, Maciej Suminski wrote: Hi Maurice, What revision did you use? Today I fixed it (da051379), so it depends whether you already have the recent patches. Let me know if there are still problems.

Re: [Kicad-developers] [RFC] new connectivity algorithm - testers needed

2017-06-30 Thread Maciej Suminski
Hi Maurice, What revision did you use? Today I fixed it (da051379), so it depends whether you already have the recent patches. Let me know if there are still problems. Regards, Orson On 06/30/2017 05:58 PM, easyw wrote: > Hi, > I'm having a strange behavior when loading a netlist > > with the

Re: [Kicad-developers] [RFC] new connectivity algorithm - testers needed

2017-06-30 Thread easyw
Hi, I'm having a strange behavior when loading a netlist with the menu Tools, Load Netlist if I select to Delete Single Pads Nets, almost all pads will lose their connectivity... (you can see in the report that the algo is deleting the net connectivity when parsing the pads) This was not the

Re: [Kicad-developers] [RFC] new connectivity algorithm - testers needed

2017-06-29 Thread Tomasz Wlostowski
On 29.06.2017 18:36, Heikki Pulkkinen wrote: > Hi > > Just start implementing my tools to new connectivity algorithm, and > noticed that via stitchin chain needs to as many copper pour fills as > there are chain links. Videos show what I mean. > Hi Heikki, Can you send us the board that you

Re: [Kicad-developers] [RFC] new connectivity algorithm - testers needed

2017-06-29 Thread Heikki Pulkkinen
Hi Just start implementing my tools to new connectivity algorithm, and noticed that via stitchin chain needs to as many copper pour fills as there are chain links. Videos show what I mean. regards Heikki new: https://youtu.be/ZV4AMstIdQY old: https://youtu.be/QGr2p6M6Su0 On Tue, Apr 25, 2017

Re: [Kicad-developers] [RFC] new connectivity algorithm - testers needed

2017-06-27 Thread Simon Küppers
Don't worry! I was just curious. Best Regards Simon Am 27.06.2017 um 21:54 schrieb Tomasz Wlostowski: > On 27.06.2017 21:24, Simon Küppers wrote: >> Small Bump. >> >> Can anyone shed some light on the new Via Tool? Is it supposed to be not >> ready yet? The Track & Via Properties Dialog looks

Re: [Kicad-developers] [RFC] new connectivity algorithm - testers needed

2017-06-27 Thread Tomasz Wlostowski
On 27.06.2017 21:24, Simon Küppers wrote: > Small Bump. > > Can anyone shed some light on the new Via Tool? Is it supposed to be not > ready yet? The Track & Via Properties Dialog looks really unfinished and > I cannot modify anything beside Position and Via Size there. Is it > because I am using

Re: [Kicad-developers] [RFC] new connectivity algorithm - testers needed

2017-06-27 Thread Simon Küppers
Small Bump. Can anyone shed some light on the new Via Tool? Is it supposed to be not ready yet? The Track & Via Properties Dialog looks really unfinished and I cannot modify anything beside Position and Via Size there. Is it because I am using the Cairo Canvas? Best Regards Simon Am 25.06.2017

Re: [Kicad-developers] [RFC] new connectivity algorithm - testers needed

2017-06-23 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
On 6/23/2017 4:47 PM, Maciej Suminski wrote: > On 06/23/2017 08:41 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: >> On 6/23/2017 1:01 PM, Maciej Sumiński wrote: > [snip] >>> While discussing this topic, I suggest also removing unconnected nodes >>> count and board bounding box, as they are also computed on the fly.

Re: [Kicad-developers] [RFC] new connectivity algorithm - testers needed

2017-06-23 Thread Maciej Suminski
On 06/23/2017 08:41 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > On 6/23/2017 1:01 PM, Maciej Sumiński wrote: [snip] >> While discussing this topic, I suggest also removing unconnected nodes >> count and board bounding box, as they are also computed on the fly. > > I'm not sure the unconnected nodes count should

Re: [Kicad-developers] [RFC] new connectivity algorithm - testers needed

2017-06-23 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
On 6/23/2017 1:01 PM, Maciej Sumiński wrote: > Hi, > > After a long testing period, it is time to commit the new connectivity > algorithm. We have neither received any new bug reports, nor we could > find any defects ourselves. > > Effectively it means: > - long awaited stitching vias are at

Re: [Kicad-developers] [RFC] new connectivity algorithm - testers needed

2017-06-23 Thread Maciej Sumiński
Hi, After a long testing period, it is time to commit the new connectivity algorithm. We have neither received any new bug reports, nor we could find any defects ourselves. Effectively it means: - long awaited stitching vias are at your service - ratsnest calculations should be much faster -

Re: [Kicad-developers] [RFC] new connectivity algorithm - testers needed

2017-06-13 Thread Jean-Samuel Reynaud
Hi All, I had perform some speed test on a complex board (12 layers, 42 zones, 649 nets, 2156 pads, 8556 tracks) and as far as I see it's really better: - Open/close pcbnew test: => 24 seconds with current code => 8 seconds with this new algo - Move a single module/footprint: => 14 seconds

Re: [Kicad-developers] [RFC] new connectivity algorithm - testers needed

2017-06-12 Thread Jakub Kozdon
Hi Tomasz, any updates about connectivity algorithm? Jakub Dne 25.4.2017 v 17:23 Tomasz Wlostowski napsal(a): Hi all, I've pushed the branch [1] containing a rewrite of the pcbnew's connectivity algorithm. By this algorithm, I mean: - computing the ratsnest and checking if all connections

Re: [Kicad-developers] [RFC] new connectivity algorithm - testers needed

2017-05-20 Thread Heikki Pulkkinen
And current algo. https://youtu.be/QSEZkmpLwvc On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Heikki Pulkkinen wrote: > Hi Tomasz, > > Just tested, sorry to say, that it was hard. Mouse wheel zoom and clicks > does not work at all.I am using Fedora 24. One notice is, that It is taking >

Re: [Kicad-developers] [RFC] new connectivity algorithm - testers needed

2017-05-01 Thread Nick Østergaard
2017-04-25 17:23 GMT+02:00 Tomasz Wlostowski : > > Hi all, > > I've pushed the branch [1] containing a rewrite of the pcbnew's > connectivity algorithm. By this algorithm, I mean: > - computing the ratsnest and checking if all connections are complete > - propagating net

Re: [Kicad-developers] [RFC] new connectivity algorithm - testers needed

2017-05-01 Thread Simon Richter
Hi, On 25.04.2017 17:23, Tomasz Wlostowski wrote: > I've pushed the branch [1] containing a rewrite of the pcbnew's > connectivity algorithm. By this algorithm, I mean: There is a new compiler warning: pcbnew/edit.cpp: In member function 'void PCB_EDIT_FRAME::OnSelectTool(wxCommandEvent&)':

Re: [Kicad-developers] [RFC] new connectivity algorithm - testers needed

2017-04-29 Thread Tomasz Wlostowski
On 28.04.2017 23:04, Jakub Kozdon wrote: > Hi Tom, > > Can not build on Linux (LMDE2 3.16.0-4-amd64) see log. > > KiCad master build like a charm. > Hi Jakub, Fixed, give it a try if you can... Cheers, Tom > Jakub > > Dne 25.4.2017 v 17:23 Tomasz Wlostowski napsal(a): >> Hi all, >> >> I've

Re: [Kicad-developers] [RFC] new connectivity algorithm - testers needed

2017-04-28 Thread Tomasz Wlostowski
On 28.04.2017 23:04, Jakub Kozdon wrote: > Hi Tom, > > Can not build on Linux (LMDE2 3.16.0-4-amd64) see log. > > KiCad master build like a charm. > Looks like an issue with Python bindings. Can some Python gurus here look at this? Cheers, Tom > Jakub > > Dne 25.4.2017 v 17:23 Tomasz

Re: [Kicad-developers] [RFC] new connectivity algorithm - testers needed

2017-04-27 Thread Tomasz Wlostowski
On 27.04.2017 08:19, jp charras wrote: > Le 26/04/2017 à 21:53, Tomasz Wlostowski a écrit : >> On 26.04.2017 21:28, jp charras wrote: >>> Le 26/04/2017 à 20:54, Tomasz Wlostowski a écrit : > > I did not noticed strange things. > However I ran into an issue when running the DRC: >

Re: [Kicad-developers] [RFC] new connectivity algorithm - testers needed

2017-04-27 Thread jp charras
Le 26/04/2017 à 21:53, Tomasz Wlostowski a écrit : > On 26.04.2017 21:28, jp charras wrote: >> Le 26/04/2017 à 20:54, Tomasz Wlostowski a écrit : I did not noticed strange things. However I ran into an issue when running the DRC: the tracks test (clearance test) is very slow:

Re: [Kicad-developers] [RFC] new connectivity algorithm - testers needed

2017-04-26 Thread Tomasz Wlostowski
On 26.04.2017 21:28, jp charras wrote: > Le 26/04/2017 à 20:54, Tomasz Wlostowski a écrit : >>> >>> I did not noticed strange things. >>> However I ran into an issue when running the DRC: >>> the tracks test (clearance test) is very slow: >>> Calculation time is x20 to x25 >>> Hi JP, Fixed.

Re: [Kicad-developers] [RFC] new connectivity algorithm - testers needed

2017-04-26 Thread jp charras
Le 26/04/2017 à 20:54, Tomasz Wlostowski a écrit : > On 26.04.2017 20:23, jp charras wrote: >> Le 25/04/2017 à 17:23, Tomasz Wlostowski a écrit : >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I've pushed the branch [1] containing a rewrite of the pcbnew's >>> connectivity algorithm. By this algorithm, I mean: >>> -

Re: [Kicad-developers] [RFC] new connectivity algorithm - testers needed

2017-04-26 Thread Tomasz Wlostowski
On 26.04.2017 20:23, jp charras wrote: > Le 25/04/2017 à 17:23, Tomasz Wlostowski a écrit : >> >> Hi all, >> >> I've pushed the branch [1] containing a rewrite of the pcbnew's >> connectivity algorithm. By this algorithm, I mean: >> - computing the ratsnest and checking if all connections are

Re: [Kicad-developers] [RFC] new connectivity algorithm - testers needed

2017-04-26 Thread jp charras
Le 25/04/2017 à 17:23, Tomasz Wlostowski a écrit : > > Hi all, > > I've pushed the branch [1] containing a rewrite of the pcbnew's > connectivity algorithm. By this algorithm, I mean: > - computing the ratsnest and checking if all connections are complete > - propagating net codes from the pads

[Kicad-developers] [RFC] new connectivity algorithm - testers needed

2017-04-25 Thread Tomasz Wlostowski
Hi all, I've pushed the branch [1] containing a rewrite of the pcbnew's connectivity algorithm. By this algorithm, I mean: - computing the ratsnest and checking if all connections are complete - propagating net codes from the pads to the tracks/vias - removing unconnected copper islands in zones