Re: [Kicad-developers] 0.1 degrees

2016-04-12 8:34 GMT+02:00 Lorenzo Marcantonio : > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 07:58:05AM +1000, Cirilo Bernardo wrote: > >> a) ability to use "." or "," regardless of the language setting - assuming >> no sensible person ever enters a thousands separator in CAD software >>

Re: [Kicad-developers] 0.1 degrees

On 4/12/2016 2:34 AM, Lorenzo Marcantonio wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 07:58:05AM +1000, Cirilo Bernardo wrote: > >> a) ability to use "." or "," regardless of the language setting - assuming >> no sensible person ever enters a thousands separator in CAD software >> (I don't know any CAD

Re: [Kicad-developers] 0.1 degrees

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 07:58:05AM +1000, Cirilo Bernardo wrote: > a) ability to use "." or "," regardless of the language setting - assuming > no sensible person ever enters a thousands separator in CAD software > (I don't know any CAD software which accepts thousands separators). Already doing

Re: [Kicad-developers] 0.1 degrees

I agree that a new wxValidator is the best way to go. From discussions on IRC, people have been asking for: a) ability to use "." or "," regardless of the language setting - assuming no sensible person ever enters a thousands separator in CAD software (I don't know any CAD software which accepts

Re: [Kicad-developers] 0.1 degrees

On 4/11/2016 2:16 AM, Lorenzo Marcantonio wrote: > On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 10:37:43AM -0400, Chris Pavlina wrote: >> Anyone mind if I go through and fix the "in 0.1 degrees" units that are all >> over pcbnew? I don't see any reason why we can't let the user enter unit >> degrees with a decimal

Re: [Kicad-developers] 0.1 degrees

On 4/11/2016 11:01 AM, Tomasz Wlostowski wrote: > On 11.04.2016 16:57, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: >> On 4/11/2016 10:39 AM, jp charras wrote: >>> Le 11/04/2016 16:07, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit : On 4/11/2016 9:43 AM, jp charras wrote: > Le 11/04/2016 15:12, Nick Østergaard a écrit : >> In

Re: [Kicad-developers] 0.1 degrees

On 4/11/2016 10:39 AM, jp charras wrote: > Le 11/04/2016 16:07, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit : >> On 4/11/2016 9:43 AM, jp charras wrote: >>> Le 11/04/2016 15:12, Nick Østergaard a écrit : In addition I would vote for a proper validator that accepts units. We already have the feature to enter

Re: [Kicad-developers] 0.1 degrees

Le 11/04/2016 16:07, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit : > On 4/11/2016 9:43 AM, jp charras wrote: >> Le 11/04/2016 15:12, Nick Østergaard a écrit : >>> In addition I would vote for a proper validator that accepts units. We >>> already have the feature to enter 42.34 mm even if you are in inch >>> mode

Re: [Kicad-developers] 0.1 degrees

On 4/11/2016 9:43 AM, jp charras wrote: > Le 11/04/2016 15:12, Nick Østergaard a écrit : >> In addition I would vote for a proper validator that accepts units. We >> already have the feature to enter 42.34 mm even if you are in inch >> mode globally. With the wxvalidator you can not enter letters

Re: [Kicad-developers] 0.1 degrees

On 2016-04-11 15:12, Nick Østergaard wrote: > In addition I would vote for a proper validator that accepts units. We > already have the feature to enter 42.34 mm even if you are in inch > mode globally. With the wxvalidator you can not enter letters at all, > and hence not the unit. +1 And...

Re: [Kicad-developers] 0.1 degrees

Le 11/04/2016 15:12, Nick Østergaard a écrit : > In addition I would vote for a proper validator that accepts units. We > already have the feature to enter 42.34 mm even if you are in inch > mode globally. With the wxvalidator you can not enter letters at all, > and hence not the unit. For this

Re: [Kicad-developers] 0.1 degrees

Yup, the validator system is very slick, I like it. I'm liking a lot of this new wx dialog stuff, which is interesting considering how much I otherwise dislike wx :D I'll have a look and see if it's been fixed upstream, though honestly if not, the wxFloatingPointValidator is so simple it's

Re: [Kicad-developers] 0.1 degrees

Please use validators! This goes along with my announcement about our dialog design. Take look at the wxWidgets validator sample so you understand how transferring data to and from the dialog controls is designed in wxWidgets. Done correctly, it will greatly simplify our dialog code. Maybe you

Re: [Kicad-developers] 0.1 degrees

In addition I would vote for a proper validator that accepts units. We already have the feature to enter 42.34 mm even if you are in inch mode globally. With the wxvalidator you can not enter letters at all, and hence not the unit. 2016-04-11 15:09 GMT+02:00 jp charras : >

Re: [Kicad-developers] 0.1 degrees

Making a derivative entry box is silly. If wxFloatingPointValidator is broken we should make a new wxValidator, not a new entry box, as that is the idiomatic way to do this in wx. I'm sure Wayne would concur on that. I'd have no problem developing that, too. On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 03:09:33PM

Re: [Kicad-developers] 0.1 degrees

Le 11/04/2016 14:10, Chris Pavlina a écrit : > ...why would I make some special entry box for this? What's wrong with what > I've already done? Nothing really wrong, but: * At least on Windows, wxFloatingPointValidator does not work fine: - as long you are using the default language, it works.

Re: [Kicad-developers] 0.1 degrees

...why would I make some special entry box for this? What's wrong with what I've already done? On Apr 11, 2016 2:18 AM, "Lorenzo Marcantonio" wrote: > On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 10:37:43AM -0400, Chris Pavlina wrote: > > Anyone mind if I go through and fix the "in 0.1

Re: [Kicad-developers] 0.1 degrees

On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 10:37:43AM -0400, Chris Pavlina wrote: > Anyone mind if I go through and fix the "in 0.1 degrees" units that are all > over pcbnew? I don't see any reason why we can't let the user enter unit > degrees with a decimal point. Probably stems for avoiding floats around the

Re: [Kicad-developers] 0.1 degrees

I just fixed three of them. If there are others, I didn't see them, so please point them out to me. On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 07:47:28PM -0400, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > Great! Thanks for fixing this. It's been a long time coming. > > On 4/9/2016 4:20 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote: > >

Re: [Kicad-developers] 0.1 degrees

Great! Thanks for fixing this. It's been a long time coming. On 4/9/2016 4:20 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote: > wxFloatingPointValidator was pretty straightforward for this. 6679 switches > the > new arbitrary module text angle to FP units, refactors the dialog to use > TransferDataToWindow, and

Re: [Kicad-developers] 0.1 degrees

wxFloatingPointValidator was pretty straightforward for this. 6679 switches the new arbitrary module text angle to FP units, refactors the dialog to use TransferDataToWindow, and cleans up the arbitrary angle patch a bit. I'll continue doing this with the other 0.1deg fields. On Sat, Apr 09, 2016

Re: [Kicad-developers] 0.1 degrees

Awesome, I'm starting on that now. On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 02:36:49PM -0400, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > We've being talking about this for a long time so I would like to see > this implemented. Entering 900 for 90.0 degrees really doesn't make > much sense. You may have to write your own

Re: [Kicad-developers] 0.1 degrees

We've being talking about this for a long time so I would like to see this implemented. Entering 900 for 90.0 degrees really doesn't make much sense. You may have to write your own validator if wxFloatingPointValidator does not meet your needs. I haven't used wxFloatingPointValidator so I don't

Re: [Kicad-developers] 0.1 degrees

The others also have a minimum resolution too, unless you think you can align things to femtometers ;) On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 03:38:08AM +1200, Simon Wells wrote: > do they not have the difference of being limited to only 1 decimal > place unlike the others though? > > On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at

Re: [Kicad-developers] 0.1 degrees

do they not have the difference of being limited to only 1 decimal place unlike the others though? On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 3:27 AM, Chris Pavlina wrote: > Values already have to be validated. The only issue I can think of is related > to the decimal point / comma issue,

Re: [Kicad-developers] 0.1 degrees

Values already have to be validated. The only issue I can think of is related to the decimal point / comma issue, but we're *already* accepting decimal points in values in other fields in the same dialogs (for positional offsets, for instance). I figure it should be fine as long as they're handled

Re: [Kicad-developers] 0.1 degrees

This was seen in a previous thread iirc and wayne mentioned that someone would need to write it so that it verified values were entered correctly etc On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 2:37 AM, Chris Pavlina wrote: > Anyone mind if I go through and fix the "in 0.1 degrees" units

[Kicad-developers] 0.1 degrees

Anyone mind if I go through and fix the "in 0.1 degrees" units that are all over pcbnew? I don't see any reason why we can't let the user enter unit degrees with a decimal point. -- Chris ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post