Hi,
On 14.09.2015 19:10, Mark Roszko wrote:
> Weird, its supposed to be 0 for ints.
> http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/types/numeric_limits/epsilon
I was referring to the bit where it says "It is only meaningful if
std::numeric_limits::is_integer == false". I think it's not a big
problem for in
Weird, its supposed to be 0 for ints.
http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/types/numeric_limits/epsilon
Is a include missing?
I'm staring at the MSVC header and it appears to have the 0 default.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Simon Richter
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while investigating an internal compi
Hi,
while investigating an internal compiler error[1] in MSVC, I ran across
this function.
My feeling is that it is broken:
For int:
top_left = std::numeric_limits::min() / 2 +
std::numeric_limits::epsilon();
size = std::numeric_limits::max() -
st
3 matches
Mail list logo
