Hi,
On 05.06.2016 20:12, Chris Pavlina wrote:
> Uh, has anyone besides Nick and Simon seen this?
Windows builds against 1.60 still AFAIK, mainly because FindBoost.cmake
has an explicit list of versions to look for, so it isn't a simple drop
in replacement.
Simon
signature.asc
On 06.06.2016 02:41, Chris Pavlina wrote:
> A lot more about the API has changed than that. I'm trying to fix it, but this
> is the first time I've seen boost::context and I'm not sure I'll be able to
> get
> it done in a timely manner. You should have a look at this. The return types
> and call
A lot more about the API has changed than that. I'm trying to fix it, but this
is the first time I've seen boost::context and I'm not sure I'll be able to get
it done in a timely manner. You should have a look at this. The return types
and call signatures have totally changed.
On Sun, Jun 05,
On 05.06.2016 20:12, Chris Pavlina wrote:
> Uh, has anyone besides Nick and Simon seen this?
>
Hi,
I did.
Boost devs changed the context api again.
boost::fcontext_t is now in
Cheers,
Tom
> On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 05:05:50PM +0200, Nick Østergaard wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Just a heads up, Boost
Uh, has anyone besides Nick and Simon seen this?
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 05:05:50PM +0200, Nick Østergaard wrote:
> Hi
>
> Just a heads up, Boost 1.61.0 breaks the KiCad build.
>
> See https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1584326
>
> Regards
> Nick Østergaard
>
>
Hi
Just a heads up, Boost 1.61.0 breaks the KiCad build.
See https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1584326
Regards
Nick Østergaard
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
6 matches
Mail list logo
