On 13.03.2017 22:11, Michael wrote:
> Hi,
> currently I'm using the following patch for the FreeBSD Port.
> (I'm not entirely shure if clang sets __x86_64__ too or only __amd64__)
>
Hi Michael,
I've pushed your patch. Thank for your contribution to Kicad!
Cheers,
Tom
Hi,
nearly the same.
I added the #elif __amd64__ section for completeness.
Greetings
---
Mike
Am 13. März 2017 23:03:33 MEZ schrieb Chris Pavlina :
>Isn't this the same as what I linked to?
>
>On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:11:54PM +0100, Michael wrote:
>> Hi,
>> currently
Isn't this the same as what I linked to?
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:11:54PM +0100, Michael wrote:
> Hi,
> currently I'm using the following patch for the FreeBSD Port.
> (I'm not entirely shure if clang sets __x86_64__ too or only __amd64__)
>
> --- include/system/libcontext.h.orig 2017-03-13
Hi,
currently I'm using the following patch for the FreeBSD Port.
(I'm not entirely shure if clang sets __x86_64__ too or only __amd64__)
--- include/system/libcontext.h.orig 2017-03-13 11:47:23.495919000 +0100
+++ include/system/libcontext.h 2017-03-13 11:51:12.678651000 +0100
@@ -23,13 +23,15
On 13.03.2017 18:56, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> Is this Tom's context library code? If so, Tom would you please comment
> on the patch. I'm OK with assuming it doesn't break anything.
>
Hi Wayne,
It's OK. I'll merge it soon.
Cheers,
Tom
> On 3/13/2017 1:50 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
Is this Tom's context library code? If so, Tom would you please comment
on the patch. I'm OK with assuming it doesn't break anything.
On 3/13/2017 1:50 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Would there be serious objection to merging a very minor patch to make
> KiCad build properly on FreeBSD?
Hi,
Would there be serious objection to merging a very minor patch to make
KiCad build properly on FreeBSD? This isn't anything big, it's basically
just adding __FreeBSD__ to the list of defines to test for alongside
__linux__ in a couple places:
7 matches
Mail list logo