___
From: Simon Richter
Sent: 30 April 2019 00:54
To: Mário Luzeiro; kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Kicad-developers] GLM 0.9.9.3 and GLM_FORCE_PURE
Hi Mário,
On 29.04.19 23:49, Mário Luzeiro wrote:
> I was checking the commit, it is a commit by Cirilo from some o
Hi Mário,
On 29.04.19 23:49, Mário Luzeiro wrote:
> I was checking the commit, it is a commit by Cirilo from some of my
> indications for includes and he copied the file at that state.
> I checked my log where that changes come from and there was also noting
> useful there.
> So it may was some
Richter
Sent: 29 April 2019 20:20
To: kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Kicad-developers] GLM 0.9.9.3 and GLM_FORCE_PURE
Hi Wayne,
On 29.04.19 20:15, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> Rather than remove it completely, how about build option to disable the
> SIMD on platforms that
Hi Wayne,
On 29.04.19 20:15, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> Rather than remove it completely, how about build option to disable the
> SIMD on platforms that don't support it. Even better, there is probably
> a way to query the compiler to check if it supports SIMD and
> enable/disable accordingly.
GL
e flags for GLM that limit the
> intrinsic usage.. but that may cause you issues again. :/
>
> Mario Luzeiro
>
>
> From: Kicad-developers
> on behalf of
> Seth Hillbrand
> Sent: 29 April 2019 03:21
> To: Simon R
that may cause you issues again. :/
Mario Luzeiro
From: Kicad-developers
on behalf of
Seth Hillbrand
Sent: 29 April 2019 03:21
To: Simon Richter
Cc: KiCad Developers
Subject: Re: [Kicad-developers] GLM 0.9.9.3 and GLM_FORCE_PURE
Am 2019-04-28 17:47, sc
Am 2019-04-28 17:47, schrieb Simon Richter:
Hi,
it appears we can avoid running into the "constexpr" problem with GLM
0.9.9.3 by either
- deleting "#define GLM_FORCE_PURE" from
include/plugins/3dapi/xv3d_types.h
or
- switching to C++14 mode
Do we actually need the GLM_FORCE_PURE? The com
Hi,
it appears we can avoid running into the "constexpr" problem with GLM
0.9.9.3 by either
- deleting "#define GLM_FORCE_PURE" from include/plugins/3dapi/xv3d_types.h
or
- switching to C++14 mode
Do we actually need the GLM_FORCE_PURE? The commit where it was
introduced doesn't explain why,
I tried to version pin in the Mac builder. We will see how successful that
is :)
Adam
On Sat, Dec 15, 2018, 8:40 PM Seth Hillbrand Am 2018-12-15 20:47, schrieb Adam Wolf:
> > Hi folks!
> >
> > A Mac build of mine failed this afternoon since the VM installed GLM
> > 0.9.9.3 and we say that is to
Am 2018-12-15 20:47, schrieb Adam Wolf:
Hi folks!
A Mac build of mine failed this afternoon since the VM installed GLM
0.9.9.3 and we say that is too new.
Do we have any plans on increasing the maximum version?
Based on John's sleuthing, it looks like we can bump the version as soon
as we mo
Hi folks!
A Mac build of mine failed this afternoon since the VM installed GLM
0.9.9.3 and we say that is too new.
Do we have any plans on increasing the maximum version?
Adam
*18:46:55* default: -- Check for installed GLEW -- found*18:46:55*
default: CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:591 (
I'll bump this down to 0.9.5.1 until the new 3D viewer code is merged
into the product branch. I may have to bump it back up during the merge
but that may not be until after next ubuntu lts version is released so
it may be less of an issue.
On 12/16/2015 4:53 AM, Jean-Samuel Reynaud wrote:
> So i
So it's mean that for ppa daily build, I have to create or found a
backport for glm (for ubuntu 14.04)?
Le 16/12/2015 10:45, Cirilo Bernardo a écrit :
> 0.9.5.1 is definitely good enough for the main branch; it's only the new
> 3D work (which is still far from merging) which might require a highe
0.9.5.1 is definitely good enough for the main branch; it's only the new 3D
work (which is still far from merging) which might require a higher version
(or it might not - it hasn't been tested with 0.9.5.1).
- Cirilo
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 7:58 PM, Jean-Samuel Reynaud
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currentl
Hi,
Currently the version on CMakeLists.txt is 0.9.5.4. On Ubuntu 14.04 the
available version is 0.9.5.1.
Did I build a backport of libglm for ubuntu or 0.9.5.1 is enougth ?
or other solution ?
Regards,
Le 05/12/2015 23:11, Cirilo Bernardo a écrit :
> I had a look at GLM issues and it's a bigger
I had a look at GLM issues and it's a bigger hassle than I initially
imagined.
1. earlier versions provided a very primitive FindGLM which did not handle
versions
2. current versions deprecated FindGLM in favor of the glmConfig.cmake
files etc
which in principle allow you to use glm as an 'externa
suggested as
reference.
Mario
From: Cirilo Bernardo [cirilo.berna...@gmail.com]
Sent: 05 December 2015 20:24
To: Wayne Stambaugh
Cc: Mário Luzeiro; kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Kicad-developers] GLM
On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 2:30 AM, Wayne
; Mario
> >
> >
> > From: Kicad-developers
> > [kicad-developers-bounces+mrluzeiro=ua...@lists.launchpad.net
> > <mailto:ua...@lists.launchpad.net>
> > <mailto:ua...@lists.launchpad.net <mailt
Orson,
> > >
> > > Cirilo got the version from my branch and I am using it since I
> > started my branch.
> > > I guess there are no issues, so it maybe now a good idea (after
> > the release) to update some libraries.
> > >
ua...@lists.launchpad.net>] on behalf of Wayne Stambaugh
> [stambau...@gmail.com <mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>]
> Sent: 04 December 2015 17:08
> To: kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
> <mailto:kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net>
> Subject: Re: [Kica
ready.
Mario
From: Cirilo Bernardo [cirilo.berna...@gmail.com]
Sent: 04 December 2015 20:51
To: Mário Luzeiro
Cc: Wayne Stambaugh; kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Kicad-developers] GLM
GLM seems to have changed the names/locations of some header fi
)
>
> Mario
>
>
> From: Kicad-developers [kicad-developers-bounces+mrluzeiro=
> ua...@lists.launchpad.net] on behalf of Wayne Stambaugh [
> stambau...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 04 December 2015 17:08
> To: kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.ne
From: Kicad-developers
> [kicad-developers-bounces+mrluzeiro=ua...@lists.launchpad.net] on behalf of
> Wayne Stambaugh [stambau...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 04 December 2015 17:08
> To: kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
> Subject: Re: [Kicad-developers] GLM
>
> Is the GLM l
kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Kicad-developers] GLM
Is the GLM library a new dependency for the 3D viewer? If so, why are
you not using the current released version? I do not want to be on a
continuous cycle of using unreleased libraries. In the past this has
caused us a lot of
rio
>
> From: Kicad-developers
> [kicad-developers-bounces+mrluzeiro=ua...@lists.launchpad.net] on behalf of
> Maciej Sumiński [maciej.sumin...@cern.ch]
> Sent: 04 December 2015 08:37
> To: Cirilo Bernardo; KiCad Developers
> Subject:
_
> From: Kicad-developers
> [kicad-developers-bounces+mrluzeiro=ua...@lists.launchpad.net] on behalf of
> Maciej Sumiński [maciej.sumin...@cern.ch]
> Sent: 04 December 2015 08:37
> To: Cirilo Bernardo; KiCad Developers
> Subject: Re: [Kicad-developers] GLM
>
> Hi Cirilo,
: Re: [Kicad-developers] GLM
Hi Cirilo,
I do not see any obstacles. Are you already testing the new version? If
everything seems fine, then I will update it in the product branch.
Regards,
Orson
On 12/03/2015 10:10 PM, Cirilo Bernardo wrote:
> While looking into preparing an initial merge of
Hi Cirilo,
I do not see any obstacles. Are you already testing the new version? If
everything seems fine, then I will update it in the product branch.
Regards,
Orson
On 12/03/2015 10:10 PM, Cirilo Bernardo wrote:
> While looking into preparing an initial merge of the 3D refactor branch I
> notic
While looking into preparing an initial merge of the 3D refactor branch I
noticed that kicad has the GLM v0.94. The newer rendering code makes
use of GLM v0.98. Are there any objections to replacing GLM with the
later version?
- Cirilo
___
Mailing list
Le 17/02/2014 09:17, Maciej Sumiński a écrit :
> Hi Camille,
>
> GLM library used in KiCad, as you correctly assumed, is not patched. I
> have tested the patch under Linux and I did not encounter any
> difficulties. The decision to apply the patch is up to the main developers.
>
> Regards,
> Orso
patch.
--
Camille
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 11:03:08 -0500
Subject: Re: [Kicad-developers] GLM update to 0.9.4.6
From: chisophu...@gmail.com
To: camille...@outlook.com
CC: kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
I think you forgot to attach the patch; I'm not seei
I think you forgot to attach the patch; I'm not seeing it on my end.
-- Sean Silva
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Camille 019 wrote:
> The attached patch update GLM to version 0.9.4.6 . This patch remove the
> following Clang warning.
>
> include/gal/opengl/glm/gtc/../core/func_integer.inl:1
FWIW I'm seeing this warning as well when building.
-- Sean Silva
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Camille 019 wrote:
> The attached patch update GLM to version 0.9.4.6 . This patch remove the
> following Clang warning.
>
> include/gal/opengl/glm/gtc/../core/func_integer.inl:106:95: warning:
>
The attached patch update GLM to version 0.9.4.6 . This patch remove the
following Clang warning.
include/gal/opengl/glm/gtc/../core/func_integer.inl:106:95: warning: operator
'<<' has lower precedence than '-'; '-' will be evaluated first
[-Wshift-op-parentheses]
return genUType(detail::hi
The attached patch update GLM to version 0.9.4.6 . This patch remove the
following Clang warning.
include/gal/opengl/glm/gtc/../core/func_integer.inl:106:95: warning: operator
'<<' has lower precedence than '-'; '-' will be evaluated first
[-Wshift-op-parentheses]
return
35 matches
Mail list logo
