On 07/07/2014 11:41 AM, jp charras wrote:
> Le 07/07/2014 14:48, Dick Hollenbeck a écrit :
>> On 07/07/2014 02:34 AM, jp charras wrote:
>>> Le 07/07/2014 06:20, Dick Hollenbeck a écrit :
I added back annotation to Eeschema directly from Cvpcb when they are both
running under
Kicad.e
Le 07/07/2014 14:48, Dick Hollenbeck a écrit :
> On 07/07/2014 02:34 AM, jp charras wrote:
>> Le 07/07/2014 06:20, Dick Hollenbeck a écrit :
>>> I added back annotation to Eeschema directly from Cvpcb when they are both
>>> running under
>>> Kicad.exe.
>>>
>>> I could have done it row by row. Ins
On 07/07/2014 02:34 AM, jp charras wrote:
> Le 07/07/2014 06:20, Dick Hollenbeck a écrit :
>> I added back annotation to Eeschema directly from Cvpcb when they are both
>> running under
>> Kicad.exe.
>>
>> I could have done it row by row. Instead I did it as a group batch when you
>> "save" unde
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 02:50:12AM -0700, Jason Whiteman wrote:
> I do not have a "package" property - I use footprint as my package
> property. Footprint = the logical name of the library part (not package).
> When I use CvPCB to generate a cmp file - my 0402 is changed to SMD_C_0402
> (or simil
"And what would the problem be? It would replace the package with the
same value..."
I do not have a "package" property - I use footprint as my package
property. Footprint = the logical name of the library part (not package).
When I use CvPCB to generate a cmp file - my 0402 is changed to SMD_C_
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 01:32:02AM -0700, Jason Whiteman wrote:
> Maybe my workflow in using Kicad is does not match the expectations of use
> - but I avoid back-annotation from CvPCB because I generally populate
> "footprint" with what should be regarded as "package" (0402, etc) and keep
> this "w
Maybe my workflow in using Kicad is does not match the expectations of use
- but I avoid back-annotation from CvPCB because I generally populate
"footprint" with what should be regarded as "package" (0402, etc) and keep
this "wrong" usage throughout. Back annotation from CvPCB (manual -
previous m
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 09:34:46AM +0200, jp charras wrote:
> This is not really a bug, but a limitation of complex hierarchies.
> But is it really a limitation ?
> When your are using complex hierarchies you are doing that because you
> want your changes (schematic modification, change a component
Le 07/07/2014 06:20, Dick Hollenbeck a écrit :
> I added back annotation to Eeschema directly from Cvpcb when they are both
> running under
> Kicad.exe.
>
> I could have done it row by row. Instead I did it as a group batch when you
> "save" under
> cvpcb, on the idea that if you were to abort
I added back annotation to Eeschema directly from Cvpcb when they are both
running under
Kicad.exe.
I could have done it row by row. Instead I did it as a group batch when you
"save" under
cvpcb, on the idea that if you were to abort cvpcb without saving, you would
not want to
affect your sche
10 matches
Mail list logo
