On 1/20/2018 2:48 PM, jp charras wrote:
> Le 20/01/2018 à 19:10, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
>> On 1/20/2018 11:49 AM, jp charras wrote:
>>>
>>> I'll try to fix it next week.
>>>
>>> If I cannot, I'll use the proposed patch.
>>
>> Thank you for help JP. I appreciate it.
>>
>
> Fixed.
>
>
That wa
Le 20/01/2018 à 19:10, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
> On 1/20/2018 11:49 AM, jp charras wrote:
>>
>> I'll try to fix it next week.
>>
>> If I cannot, I'll use the proposed patch.
>
> Thank you for help JP. I appreciate it.
>
Fixed.
--
Jean-Pierre CHARRAS
___
On 1/20/2018 11:49 AM, jp charras wrote:
> Le 20/01/2018 à 17:34, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
>> On 1/20/2018 10:58 AM, jp charras wrote:
>>> Le 20/01/2018 à 16:40, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
I concur. We should not be violating clearances even in the small
amounts in this bug report. I re
Le 20/01/2018 à 17:34, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
> On 1/20/2018 10:58 AM, jp charras wrote:
>> Le 20/01/2018 à 16:40, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
>>> I concur. We should not be violating clearances even in the small
>>> amounts in this bug report. I realize that this change will create a
>>> diff w
On 1/20/2018 10:58 AM, jp charras wrote:
> Le 20/01/2018 à 16:40, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
>> I concur. We should not be violating clearances even in the small
>> amounts in this bug report. I realize that this change will create a
>> diff when existing designs are refilled but it is a more tech
Le 20/01/2018 à 16:40, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
> I concur. We should not be violating clearances even in the small
> amounts in this bug report. I realize that this change will create a
> diff when existing designs are refilled but it is a more technically
> correct solution. Until (if?) we su
I concur. We should not be violating clearances even in the small
amounts in this bug report. I realize that this change will create a
diff when existing designs are refilled but it is a more technically
correct solution. Until (if?) we support arcs for this, I would prefer
to err on the side of
After reading the bug report, I consider the changes proposed by Julius
sensible. What do you think? In particular I am asking our geometry experts.
Regards,
Orson
On 11/02/2017 03:18 PM, Julius Schmidt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I filed a bug [1] a while ago pertaining to oval pads in zones leading
>
Hello,
I filed a bug [1] a while ago pertaining to oval pads in zones
leading to clearance violation in the Gerber output.
I've tested the current master revision
(e5c4cfc3b01724de705609c901575b40cd3958b4) and it still seems to be an
issue.
I'd appreciate it if someone took a look, as it is
9 matches
Mail list logo