Le 06/04/2016 11:59, Tomasz Wlostowski a écrit :
> On 04.04.2016 14:15, Maciej Sumiński wrote:
>> On 04/04/2016 01:39 PM, jp charras wrote:
>>> Sorry if you already sent me a response to this "old" message (first posted
>>> on feb 05)
>>> but I did not remember this response.
>
> Hi Jean-Pierre,
On 04.04.2016 14:15, Maciej Sumiński wrote:
> On 04/04/2016 01:39 PM, jp charras wrote:
>> Sorry if you already sent me a response to this "old" message (first posted
>> on feb 05)
>> but I did not remember this response.
Hi Jean-Pierre,
If you mean this code in your patch:
On 04/04/2016 01:39 PM, jp charras wrote:
> Sorry if you already sent me a response to this "old" message (first posted
> on feb 05)
> but I did not remember this response.
>
> It is annoying for the rounded rect pads which use this method.
> (I currently use a fixed (modified) version in my
Sorry if you already sent me a response to this "old" message (first posted on
feb 05)
but I did not remember this response.
It is annoying for the rounded rect pads which use this method.
(I currently use a fixed (modified) version in my patch)
I can easily fix it, but I do not want to create
Orson, Tomasz,
I am thinking there is a bug in geometry/shape_rect.h:
In
const SHAPE_LINE_CHAIN Outline() const
m_h and m_w look like they are swapped in calculations, and the outline
is incorrect (assuming m_w is the X axis rect size (width), and m_h is
the Y axis rect size (height)).
Can you
5 matches
Mail list logo