Other than a decently efficient fallback backend for systems that can't handle
OpenGL+GAL, do we have an official list of things we need to be implemented in
GAL before legacy can be taken out? I really want to keep working on the UI
cleanup, but having dual canvases is quite the roadblock to doing
Hi Chris,
Have a look at the last summary, commented by Wayne [1] and a few
reports tagged as such [2]. Perhaps we need to have a software renderer
that offers decent speed, then we can either use wxDC or try to boost
Cairo GAL performance (I have done some minor improvements [3], but
probably the
Le 16/06/2016 à 03:30, Chris Pavlina a écrit :
> Other than a decently efficient fallback backend for systems that can't handle
> OpenGL+GAL, do we have an official list of things we need to be implemented in
> GAL before legacy can be taken out? I really want to keep working on the UI
> cleanup, b
there are two missing features I noticed:
1) contextual 'Grid Select' menu to change Grid size while routing
2) Global Spread and Place menu
Maurice
On 16/06/2016 03.30, Chris Pavlina wrote:
Other than a decently efficient fallback backend for systems that can't handle
OpenGL+GAL, do we have a
I mean features we _need_ in GAL, not just things legacy has that GAL doesn't.
Some of those things don't need to be in legacy either. I don't see any need
for the Global Spread and Place menu in the future - the autorouter is garbage,
and we don't dump all the parts in a big pile anymore. What do
I mean features we _need_ in GAL
sorry, I cannot imagine what _you_ consider a need...
I just noticed that and other people did the same at the forum...
As for a grid menu...why? You can still change the grid by hotkey or by the
menu in the toolbar.
hotkeys are fine but the menu in the toolbar
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 09:50:21PM +0200, easyw wrote:
> >I mean features we _need_ in GAL
> sorry, I cannot imagine what _you_ consider a need...
> I just noticed that and other people did the same at the forum...
That's why I asked for an "official" list, I wasn't looking for opinions...
>
> >
On 6/16/2016 5:17 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 09:50:21PM +0200, easyw wrote:
>>> I mean features we _need_ in GAL
>> sorry, I cannot imagine what _you_ consider a need...
>> I just noticed that and other people did the same at the forum...
>
> That's why I asked for an "offi
8 matches
Mail list logo
