On Sep 2, 2013 4:37 AM, Brian Sidebotham brian.sidebot...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 1 September 2013 14:27, Dick Hollenbeck d...@softplc.com wrote:
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portable_Executable
Read about relocations.
Brian,
I think your idea of looking at the PE headers is good.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portable_Executable
Read about relocations.
Brian,
I think your idea of looking at the PE headers is good.
Also, maybe you can mimic the BASE ADDRESSES of the DLLs being built, and try
and get
mingw's LD, invoked under g++, to use the same ones:
On 08/23/2013 07:29 PM, Brian Sidebotham wrote:
Hey Dick,
Thanks for all your kind words! It always helps everyone to have
encouragement and
appreciation. Thank-you for the Python-a-mingw-us work, it's really essential
for us on
Windows; I'm sure it will build in favour as word gets
I just upgraded to openssl 1.0.1e, and am now building the DLL fine in
a-mingw-us,
although I think this 'e' version had nothing to do with this. Seems the
Configure script
is picky about sequence of arguments.
We now need to package the openssl DLL goodies so they can flow into a
On 31 August 2013 22:06, Dick Hollenbeck d...@softplc.com wrote:
I just upgraded to openssl 1.0.1e, and am now building the DLL fine in
a-mingw-us,
although I think this 'e' version had nothing to do with this. Seems
the Configure script
is picky about sequence of arguments.
We
On Aug 31, 2013 8:24 PM, Dick Hollenbeck d...@softplc.com wrote:
On Aug 31, 2013 5:40 PM, Brian Sidebotham brian.sidebot...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 31 August 2013 22:06, Dick Hollenbeck d...@softplc.com wrote:
I just upgraded to openssl 1.0.1e, and am now building the DLL fine
in
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 3:39 AM, Dick Hollenbeck d...@softplc.com wrote:
Brian, thank you for your truly exceptional and world class work in
bringing the software stack necessary for windows python scripting to
fruition. Thank you for believing in my vision, and in my a-mingw-us work,
and
Hey Dick,
Thanks for all your kind words! It always helps everyone to have
encouragement and appreciation. Thank-you for the Python-a-mingw-us work,
it's really essential for us on Windows; I'm sure it will build in favour
as word gets around about it. Soon I will be able to pimp wxPython-cmake a
On 20 August 2013 17:39, Dick Hollenbeck d...@softplc.com wrote:
KiCad Developers:
Anyway I've looked, building some compiled libraries for boost is required
and I have
augmented CMakeModules/download_boost.cmake to conditionally build some
compiled boost
libraries, although that support
On Aug 22, 2013 7:43 PM, Brian Sidebotham brian.sidebot...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 20 August 2013 17:39, Dick Hollenbeck d...@softplc.com wrote:
KiCad Developers:
Anyway I've looked, building some compiled libraries for boost is
required and I have
augmented
KiCad Developers:
Anyway I've looked, building some compiled libraries for boost is required and
I have
augmented CMakeModules/download_boost.cmake to conditionally build some
compiled boost
libraries, although that support is not enabled yet. There is an alternate
execution path
in that
On 08/20/2013 11:39 AM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
KiCad Developers:
Anyway I've looked, building some compiled libraries for boost is required
and I have
augmented CMakeModules/download_boost.cmake to conditionally build some
compiled boost
libraries, although that support is not enabled
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:39:27AM -0500, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
batteries. My current thinking is to try and use boost::async and forgo use
of other
networking libraries on top of that. On windows we will have to pick up
openssl support,
and that may mean insisting on the python install
- Original Message -
From: Lorenzo Marcantonio l.marcanto...@logossrl.com
To: Kicad Developers kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 4:59 AM
Subject: Re: [Kicad-developers] boost_root driven by https
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 11:39:27AM -0500
14 matches
Mail list logo
