Re: [Kicad-developers] translation code rework

2016-09-13 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
On 9/11/2016 3:22 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote: > 2016-09-09 16:02 GMT+02:00 Wayne Stambaugh : >> On 9/7/2016 2:27 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote: >>> 2016-03-12 1:37 GMT+01:00 Simon Wells : As part of the translation code rework that i am working on (and

Re: [Kicad-developers] translation code rework

2016-09-11 Thread Nick Østergaard
2016-09-09 16:02 GMT+02:00 Wayne Stambaugh : > On 9/7/2016 2:27 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote: >> 2016-03-12 1:37 GMT+01:00 Simon Wells : >>> As part of the translation code rework that i am working on (and >>> auto-detection) part of it is moving the need for

Re: [Kicad-developers] translation code rework

2016-09-09 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
On 9/7/2016 2:27 PM, Nick Østergaard wrote: > 2016-03-12 1:37 GMT+01:00 Simon Wells : >> As part of the translation code rework that i am working on (and >> auto-detection) part of it is moving the need for changing anything in >> code to add a new language. As part of this

Re: [Kicad-developers] translation code rework

2016-09-07 Thread Simon Wells
Well if you want all contributers since the epoch this could be documented in a text/md file in the kicad tree or preferably in the i18n package so that it can be updated seperate to the kicad project. On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 6:27 AM, Nick Østergaard wrote: > 2016-03-12 1:37

Re: [Kicad-developers] translation code rework

2016-09-07 Thread Nick Østergaard
2016-03-12 1:37 GMT+01:00 Simon Wells : > As part of the translation code rework that i am working on (and > auto-detection) part of it is moving the need for changing anything in > code to add a new language. As part of this involves the flags i was > wondering whether anyone

[Kicad-developers] translation code rework

2016-03-11 Thread Simon Wells
As part of the translation code rework that i am working on (and auto-detection) part of it is moving the need for changing anything in code to add a new language. As part of this involves the flags i was wondering whether anyone would be against moving them into the i18n repo (and distributed in