Re: [Kicad-developers] v5 timeline

2017-04-03 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
On 4/3/2017 3:27 AM, John Beard wrote: > I would beg to differ (e.g. how can anyone build a package when the > milestone doesn't have a VCS branch/tag and isn't released), but I > realise I don't understand at all how Kicad releases are planned and > executed. The way I understand milestones is

Re: [Kicad-developers] v5 timeline

2017-04-03 Thread John Beard
I would beg to differ (e.g. how can anyone build a package when the milestone doesn't have a VCS branch/tag and isn't released), but I realise I don't understand at all how Kicad releases are planned and executed. What /is/ the right way to track issues targeted for future milestones, if not

Re: [Kicad-developers] v5 timeline

2017-04-01 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
I just realized it's April 1st. Is the joke on me? On 4/1/2017 2:09 PM, Chris Pavlina wrote: > I think having a milestone for use in the bug tracker is valuable, I > would urge you not to have that deleted. The v5 series can go ofc. > > On Apr 1, 2017 11:31 AM, "Wayne Stambaugh"

Re: [Kicad-developers] v5 timeline

2017-04-01 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
It doesn't make any sense without a 5.0 source branch which isn't going to happen until the items that I listed are ready. Once that happens, then I will create a 5.0 branch. The problem is that you've assign a 5 series without the associated code branch. If you leave it, I promise you someone

Re: [Kicad-developers] v5 timeline

2017-04-01 Thread Chris Pavlina
I think having a milestone for use in the bug tracker is valuable, I would urge you not to have that deleted. The v5 series can go ofc. On Apr 1, 2017 11:31 AM, "Wayne Stambaugh" wrote: > Only kicad-committers should be able to do this. When I get a chance I > check the

Re: [Kicad-developers] v5 timeline

2017-04-01 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
Only kicad-committers should be able to do this. When I get a chance I check the launchpad permissions. Please remove it when you get a chance. I do not want users thinking this is an official rc1 candidate. It is not. The symbol library table, stitching via, and revised connection algorithm

Re: [Kicad-developers] v5 timeline

2017-03-31 Thread John Beard
Hi, I "accidentally" made a Launchpad series for v5: https://launchpad.net/kicad/5.0 I wasn't really expecting to have permissions to do that, but it went though, so here it is! I doubled down on it and so there's also a milestone for RC1. Project management people are of course welcome to

Re: [Kicad-developers] v5 timeline

2017-03-28 Thread Chris Pavlina
Sounds good. I've collected all the things I want to work on for 5.0 properly on Launchpad now, assigned to myself. These are: - Fix remaining UI/UX issues with the component selector. - Investigate possible footprint preview panel locale issues - Implement footprint selection tags on history

Re: [Kicad-developers] v5 timeline

2017-03-28 Thread Tomasz Wlostowski
On 28.03.2017 16:47, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > Hey Chris, > > The following items are holding up the v5 branch: > > Symbol library table (me). > Unified geometry library (Tom). > Stitching via support (Tom & Orson). > > I was hoping I would be done with the symbol library table by now but > I'm

Re: [Kicad-developers] v5 timeline

2017-03-28 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
Hey Chris, The following items are holding up the v5 branch: Symbol library table (me). Unified geometry library (Tom). Stitching via support (Tom & Orson). I was hoping I would be done with the symbol library table by now but I'm really having trouble finding the time to finish it up. I'm not

[Kicad-developers] v5 timeline

2017-03-28 Thread Chris Pavlina
Hey Wayne, In the interest of prioritizing my own work - just curious if you have any idea how long it's going to be before declaring the v5 feature freeze, and what that's waiting on. -- Chris ___ Mailing list: