On 9/3/2014 5:37 PM, yann jautard wrote:
>
> Le 03/09/2014 22:48, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
>> On 9/3/2014 3:04 PM, yann jautard wrote:
>>> Le 03/09/2014 20:08, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
On 9/3/2014 8:08 AM, yann jautard wrote:
> Le 03/09/2014 12:32, yann jautard a écrit :
>> Le 02/09
Le 03/09/2014 22:48, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
On 9/3/2014 3:04 PM, yann jautard wrote:
Le 03/09/2014 20:08, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
On 9/3/2014 8:08 AM, yann jautard wrote:
Le 03/09/2014 12:32, yann jautard a écrit :
Le 02/09/2014 18:24, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
I have this on my list o
Le 03/09/2014 22:27, Brian Sidebotham a écrit :
On 3 September 2014 20:04, yann jautard wrote:
Le 03/09/2014 20:08, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
On 9/3/2014 8:08 AM, yann jautard wrote:
Le 03/09/2014 12:32, yann jautard a écrit :
Le 02/09/2014 18:24, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
I have this on
On 9/3/2014 3:04 PM, yann jautard wrote:
>
> Le 03/09/2014 20:08, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
>> On 9/3/2014 8:08 AM, yann jautard wrote:
>>> Le 03/09/2014 12:32, yann jautard a écrit :
Le 02/09/2014 18:24, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
> I have this on my list of things to look at. It should
On 3 September 2014 20:04, yann jautard wrote:
>
> Le 03/09/2014 20:08, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
>
>> On 9/3/2014 8:08 AM, yann jautard wrote:
>>>
>>> Le 03/09/2014 12:32, yann jautard a écrit :
Le 02/09/2014 18:24, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
>
> I have this on my list of things
Le 03/09/2014 20:08, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
On 9/3/2014 8:08 AM, yann jautard wrote:
Le 03/09/2014 12:32, yann jautard a écrit :
Le 02/09/2014 18:24, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
I have this on my list of things to look at. It should be possible to
get CMake to generate make files that compa
On 9/3/2014 8:08 AM, yann jautard wrote:
>
> Le 03/09/2014 12:32, yann jautard a écrit :
>>
>> Le 02/09/2014 18:24, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
>>> I have this on my list of things to look at. It should be possible to
>>> get CMake to generate make files that compare the source repo version
>>> aga
Le 03/09/2014 12:32, yann jautard a écrit :
Le 02/09/2014 18:24, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
I have this on my list of things to look at. It should be possible to
get CMake to generate make files that compare the source repo version
against the version.h file and recreate it as required every t
Le 02/09/2014 18:24, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit :
I have this on my list of things to look at. It should be possible to
get CMake to generate make files that compare the source repo version
against the version.h file and recreate it as required every time make
is run. Currently, the only time ver
On 8/31/2014 6:09 PM, Brian Sidebotham wrote:
> On 31 August 2014 22:52, Andrew Zonenberg wrote:
>> What I did in my previous build systems is to regenerate the file in a
>> temporary directory then check if the files had the same hash. If they
>> didn't I'd update the file.
>>
>> This way, if you
On 31 August 2014 22:52, Andrew Zonenberg wrote:
> What I did in my previous build systems is to regenerate the file in a
> temporary directory then check if the files had the same hash. If they
> didn't I'd update the file.
>
> This way, if you don't change the file's contents it doesn't get touc
What I did in my previous build systems is to regenerate the file in a
temporary directory then check if the files had the same hash. If they
didn't I'd update the file.
This way, if you don't change the file's contents it doesn't get touched
and nothign else gets rebuilt.
On Sun, 2014-08-31 at 2
On 31 August 2014 22:27, Andrew Zonenberg wrote:
> Why does CMake not recompute this particular value during the
> pre-compile configuration step? It runs checks for changed stuff every
> time you "make" anyway and only caches certain things. Is it really that
> hard to not cache this particular v
Why does CMake not recompute this particular value during the
pre-compile configuration step? It runs checks for changed stuff every
time you "make" anyway and only caches certain things. Is it really that
hard to not cache this particular value?
On Sun, 2014-08-31 at 22:24 +0100, Brian Sidebotham
The version is essentially created during the CMake configure step -
when CMake generates its cache of variables. You need to re-create
this cache to update the value:
make rebuild_cache
That should update to the same as bzr revno.
Best Regards, Brian.
On 31 August 2014 21:47, Andrew Zonen
I've observed the same issue with my builds. The only workaround I've
found to date is to delete the build directory and do a full rebuild.
On Sun, 2014-08-31 at 20:56 +0200, Nick Østergaard wrote:
> Hi Yann
>
> Does 'bzr revno --tree' result in the same?
>
> 2014-08-31 20:21 GMT+02:00 yann jaut
Hi Yann
Does 'bzr revno --tree' result in the same?
2014-08-31 20:21 GMT+02:00 yann jautard :
> REVISION is set to TESTING, I use the script daily, it's the first time I
> notice something like that.
>
> the result of bzr log in my kicad source tree starts by :
>
> ---
That just looks like it did not update.
What is the REVISION variable set to in the sript? It should be
$TESTING, where that is last:1.
2014-08-31 18:12 GMT+02:00 yann jautard :
> Hi all,
>
> I don't know if this is important, but I just updated my kicad install this
> afternoon, and I noticed th
Hi all,
I don't know if this is important, but I just updated my kicad install
this afternoon, and I noticed the kicad version information is not up to
date :
yann@yann-netbook:~/kicad_sources$ ./kicad-install.sh --install-or-update
(...)
step 3) checking out the source code from launchpad r
19 matches
Mail list logo
