Re: [Kicad-developers] bzr is unmaintained. Should we move KiCAD repository to git too?

2014-01-03 Thread Brian Sidebotham
On 3 January 2014 14:09, Chris Morgan wrote: > I'm not actively making changes but in case it helps someone else, > here is what was confusing me. This is something I do a few times a > day with git in order to keep history clean and integrate patch review > feedback. > > How to get upstream chang

Re: [Kicad-developers] bzr is unmaintained. Should we move KiCAD repository to git too?

2014-01-03 Thread Chris Morgan
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Brian Sidebotham wrote: > Sorry, I've been off-list for a while whilst building my house over Christmas. > > bzr works fine and is what Launchpad hosted projects work with most > easily. I don't see anyone wanting to change, especially as there's no > real reason to

Re: [Kicad-developers] bzr is unmaintained. Should we move KiCAD repository to git too?

2014-01-03 Thread Brian Sidebotham
Sorry, I've been off-list for a while whilst building my house over Christmas. bzr works fine and is what Launchpad hosted projects work with most easily. I don't see anyone wanting to change, especially as there's no real reason to change; Besides, bzr usage is included in the build system now to

Re: [Kicad-developers] bzr is unmaintained. Should we move KiCAD repository to git too?

2014-01-03 Thread Tim Hoeppner
Hi, I'm new to the developer list for KiCAD. First off, great work, love where this project is going and I would love to help contribute. With that being said I would also put my vote in for GIT to encourage newer generations of developers. Tim On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 7:14 AM, Chris Morgan wrote

Re: [Kicad-developers] bzr is unmaintained. Should we move KiCAD repository to git too?

2014-01-03 Thread Chris Morgan
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 12:01 AM, Ouabache Designworks wrote: > My experience has been that any code worth writing will long outlive > whatever rcs system that you are using. Expect to have to do this on a > regular basis > > > John Eaton > > > > > On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 4:08 AM, Kaspar Emanuel >

Re: [Kicad-developers] bzr is unmaintained. Should we move KiCAD repository to git too?

2014-01-02 Thread Ouabache Designworks
My experience has been that any code worth writing will long outlive whatever rcs system that you are using. Expect to have to do this on a regular basis John Eaton On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 4:08 AM, Kaspar Emanuel wrote: > This discussion springing up on emacs-devel is likely relevant: > > htt

Re: [Kicad-developers] bzr is unmaintained. Should we move KiCAD repository to git too?

2014-01-02 Thread Lorenzo Marcantonio
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 01:08:54PM +0100, Kaspar Emanuel wrote: > This discussion springing up on emacs-devel is likely relevant: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2014-01/msg5.html The linked article is actually very interesting (bzr being decommissioned or not)... I partial

Re: [Kicad-developers] bzr is unmaintained. Should we move KiCAD repository to git too?

2014-01-02 Thread Kaspar Emanuel
This discussion springing up on emacs-devel is likely relevant: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2014-01/msg5.html On 2 December 2013 04:51, Povilas Kanapickas wrote: > Just for the record, git has submodules feature, which allows to store > external dependencies in-tree and ea

Re: [Kicad-developers] bzr is unmaintained. Should we move KiCAD repository to git too?

2013-12-01 Thread Povilas Kanapickas
Just for the record, git has submodules feature, which allows to store external dependencies in-tree and easily manage local patches to them. Regards, Povilas ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lis

Re: [Kicad-developers] bzr is unmaintained. Should we move KiCAD repository to git too?

2013-11-27 Thread Povilas Kanapickas
On 11/27/2013 11:47 PM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: > I have a strong objection. That makes things clear. Sorry for the spent time. > It's not just the repo that would require conversion. The bug list, > questions, FAQ, and blueprints would either have be abandoned or > migrated to another host suc

Re: [Kicad-developers] bzr is unmaintained. Should we move KiCAD repository to git too?

2013-11-27 Thread Wayne Stambaugh
On 11/27/2013 04:10 PM, Povilas Kanapickas wrote: On 11/27/2013 10:47 PM, Lorenzo Marcantonio wrote: On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:14:10PM +0200, Povilas Kanapickas wrote: The fact that bzr has so few commits would be in fact a sign that's working fine IMHO :D I believe this is not the case. See

Re: [Kicad-developers] bzr is unmaintained. Should we move KiCAD repository to git too?

2013-11-27 Thread Povilas Kanapickas
On 11/27/2013 10:47 PM, Lorenzo Marcantonio wrote: > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:14:10PM +0200, Povilas Kanapickas wrote: > > The fact that bzr has so few commits would be in fact a sign that's > working fine IMHO :D > I believe this is not the case. See [1] and e.g. this post [2]. > Please no VC

Re: [Kicad-developers] bzr is unmaintained. Should we move KiCAD repository to git too?

2013-11-27 Thread Lorenzo Marcantonio
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:14:10PM +0200, Povilas Kanapickas wrote: > On 11/27/2013 10:09 PM, Povilas Kanapickas wrote: > > ... is quite mature and there are no bugs interfere with KiCAD > > development. ... > > Sorry for the typos: > > Should be "... is quite mature and there are no bugs that

Re: [Kicad-developers] bzr is unmaintained. Should we move KiCAD repository to git too?

2013-11-27 Thread Povilas Kanapickas
On 11/27/2013 10:09 PM, Povilas Kanapickas wrote: > ... is quite mature and there are no bugs interfere with KiCAD development. > ... Sorry for the typos: Should be "... is quite mature and there are no bugs that interfere with KiCAD development. ...". Regards, Povilas __