https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441658
Hamdsa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDSINFO |RESOLVED
Resolution|WAITINGFORINFO
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441658
--- Comment #6 from Hamdsa ---
(In reply to Thomas Baumgart from comment #5)
> I want to mention two things here (which may not solve the problem but may
> be important):
>
> a) 5.1.80-b29cd34c4 is drawn from the (currently unstable) master branch and
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441658
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Baumgart ---
I want to mention two things here (which may not solve the problem but may be
important):
a) 5.1.80-b29cd34c4 is drawn from the (currently unstable) master branch and
b) the QIF importer is rather old code which
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441658
--- Comment #4 from Hamdsa ---
(In reply to Jack from comment #3)
> First, or those accounts which show this problem, do you actually see a
> transaction in the ledger prior to the account opening date?
>
> Next, when you reassign a split in one of t
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441658
--- Comment #3 from Jack ---
First, or those accounts which show this problem, do you actually see a
transaction in the ledger prior to the account opening date?
Next, when you reassign a split in one of these suspect transactions, is there
a correct
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441658
--- Comment #2 from Hamdsa ---
(In reply to Thomas Baumgart from comment #1)
> Very strange problem. Could be the result of the QIF import, though. The
> opening balance transaction should not have a payee assigned (which seems to
> be the case in your
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441658
Thomas Baumgart changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REPORTED|NEEDSINFO
Resolution|---
