Thanks Katrin!
I dont understand why in Administration-Koha-to-MARC mappings we see the
following already set in the system:
biblio.biblionumber 774 w Record control number
biblio.biblionumber 999 c Koha biblionumber
Field 774 w should not be there
--
Mg. Mercedes Portugal
Does anyone know what may be happening?
Thanks!!
--
Mg. Mercedes Portugal
Biblioteca Cnl. Manuel José Olascoaga
Instituto Geográfico Nacional
http://www.ign.gob.ar
Av. Cabildo 381 – C.A.B.A. – CP: 1426
Tel: 011 4576 5576 interno 172
dont see this
designator in your examples.
By the way. do you know what is supposed to be exactly subfield $4
relationship. We just checked that in Spain they are using it as a code for the
relationship, but there are no codes in RDAit is confused
Mercedes Portugal
De: "Heat
it on the
22.05
I would like to know how are you linking recods with 76x-77x marc fields in
Koha with 21.05 version.
Yeah sure, I will watch that video as we will use 78x fields as well.
--
Mg. Mercedes Portugal
Biblioteca Cnl. Manuel José Olascoaga
Instituto Geográfico Nacional
http
is actually implementing RDA in full? using relationships fields
76x-78x?
Thanks a lot!
--
Mg. Mercedes Portugal
Biblioteca Cnl. Manuel José Olascoaga
Instituto Geográfico Nacional
[ http://www.ign.gob.ar/ | http://www.ign.gob.ar ]
Av. Cabildo 381 – C.A.B.A. – CP: 1426
Tel: [ callto:011 4576 5576
5 matches
Mail list logo