Re: [Koha] Authority search - used in 0 (CHRON_TERM)

2014-08-25 Thread Fabio Tiana
Hi there Kamil. I too have encountered some wrong behaviours with authorities in the last times, and solved some. You can start here and try some of the steps and see if you missed anything. http://lists.katipo.co.nz/public/koha/2013-September/037395.html Let me know. Fabio 2014-08-20

Re: [Koha] Authority search - used in 0 (CHRON_TERM)

2014-08-25 Thread kamild
Hi Fabio, thanks a lot for you answer. Now everything works ok. When indexing also need to remember about subfield 9 :) Regards Kamil -- View this message in context: http://koha.1045719.n5.nabble.com/Authority-search-used-in-0-CHRON-TERM-tp5808804p5809619.html Sent from the Koha-general

Re: [Koha] Authority search - used in 0 (CHRON_TERM)

2014-08-25 Thread Fabio Tiana
Oh, that's great news! Glad to hear it. Have a nice day Kamil. Fabio 2014-08-25 13:46 GMT+02:00 kamild smichae...@tlen.pl: Hi Fabio, thanks a lot for you answer. Now everything works ok. When indexing also need to remember about subfield 9 :) Regards Kamil -- View this message in

Re: [Koha] Authority search - used in 0 (CHRON_TERM)

2014-08-20 Thread kamild
Hi Elaine, I have a lot of linked to CHRON_TERM. The subfield 9 is not empty but still have 0 linked. CORPO_NAME, GENRE/FORM, GEOGR_NAME, MEETI_NAME, PERSO_NAME, TOPIC_TERM, UNIF_TITLE works ok show numbers of links. I change in marc21/biblios/ files biblio-koha-indexdefs.xml

Re: [Koha] Authority search - used in 0 (CHRON_TERM)

2014-08-19 Thread Elaine Bradtke
They may not be linked. Take one of the terms that has 0 links and search for it in your catalogue. Then check to see if the subfield 9 for that term has a number in it. The number is the authority record number. If there is no number, then it is not linked to the authority. You may have to

[Koha] Authority search - used in 0 (CHRON_TERM)

2014-08-18 Thread kamild
Hi, in Authority search results are records which have 0 links to biblios (used in). Applies only Chronological Term (CHRON_TERM) in other Authority types is OK. Where there may be a problem? Cheers, Kamil -- View this message in context: