Re: [Koha] DOM versus GRS-1

On 2012-09-27, at 11:39 PM, Barry Cannon wrote: ** Sorry if this double posted - having some problem with the list ** Hello, I recently upgraded a site from Koha 3.6 to 3.8.5 (via 3.8.3). Shortly afterwards we noticed that there was quite a few biblios not appearing on the search

Re: [Koha] DOM versus GRS-1

The real url is of course bugs.koha-community.org saving time typing might be handy in text speak land but I find using the actual url works better on the web :) Also this has already been reported, it is to do with dom using 001 as unique identifier. If this isn't in fact unique problems

Re: [Koha] DOM versus GRS-1

On 27 September 2012 14:29, Marcel de Rooy m.de.r...@rijksmuseum.nl wrote: I have the impression that not all indexes in grs1 have a counterpart yet in dom. My hit counts are not that high under dom as they are in grs1. We should add them gradually under dom, because the idea is to leave the

[Koha] DOM versus GRS-1

** Sorry if this double posted - having some problem with the list ** Hello, I recently upgraded a site from Koha 3.6 to 3.8.5 (via 3.8.3). Shortly afterwards we noticed that there was quite a few biblios not appearing on the search results even though they exist in the database. After

[Koha] DOM versus grs-1

Hello, I recently upgraded a site from Koha 3.6 to 3.8.5 (via 3.8.3). Shortly afterwards we noticed that there was quite a few biblios not appearing on the search results even though they exist in the database. After trying many, many things I decided to switch from DOM to grs-1 and

Re: [Koha] DOM versus GRS-1

Shortly afterwards we noticed that there was quite a few biblios not appearing on the search results even though they exist in the database. After trying many, many things I decided to switch from DOM to grs-1 and rebuild the indexes. This has resolved the problem and the search results