Re: [Koha] RFC: Circulation Rules Interface and Backend Revamp RFC

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:06 PM, Agnes Rivers-Moore wrote: > If there were two codes in the item - one designed for setting rules, > and one for statistics, the issuing rules table could be less detailed. That's how we use collection codes, for what it's worth. Our collection

Re: [Koha] RFC: Circulation Rules Interface and Backend Revamp RFC

Comments - I am glad someone is taking this on. It has been growing more cumbersome and needs help. Radical suggestion - perhaps we are asking too much of a single 'item type' code and 'borrower category' code. The system currently uses these codes for both setting rules and for statistical

[Koha] RFC: Circulation Rules Interface and Backend Revamp RFC

The backend and frontend of the circulation/policy rules in Koha have been extended and stretched to the point where they cause a fair amount of issues and frustration. Many librarians and developers are uncertain when default rules are applied, and the very large number of possible settings makes