https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
--- Comment #45 from Tiago Simões ---
(In reply to Wainui Witika-Park from comment #44)
> I might leave this out of 23.05 if that's okay?
Sure, no problem, I understand.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
--- Comment #44 from Wainui Witika-Park ---
I might leave this out of 23.05 if that's okay?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Koha-bugs mailing
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
--- Comment #43 from Tiago Simões ---
(In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #42)
> Hi Tiago, there are some other bugs about improving the default UNIMARC
> frameworks and their behavior filed and in progress already.
Hi Katrin,
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
--- Comment #42 from Katrin Fischer ---
Hi Tiago, there are some other bugs about improving the default UNIMARC
frameworks and their behavior filed and in progress already.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching a
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
--- Comment #41 from Tiago Simões ---
(In reply to Wainui Witika-Park from comment #40)
> (In reply to Tiago Simões from comment #39)
> > Not sure if the comments above were for me since I expressed interest in
> > backporting it to
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
--- Comment #40 from wainuiwitikap...@catalyst.net.nz ---
(In reply to Tiago Simões from comment #39)
> Not sure if the comments above were for me since I expressed interest in
> backporting it to previous versions than 23.11, but I c
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
--- Comment #39 from Tiago Simões ---
Not sure if the comments above were for me since I expressed interest in
backporting it to previous versions than 23.11, but I can try and test in KTD.
The problem is that I don't have any experi
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
--- Comment #38 from wainuiwitikap...@catalyst.net.nz ---
(In reply to wainuiwitikapark from comment #37)
> Could I please have a more detailed test plan for 23.05?
For KTD
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching a
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
--- Comment #37 from wainuiwitikap...@catalyst.net.nz ---
Could I please have a more detailed test plan for 23.05?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
--- Comment #36 from wainuiwitikap...@catalyst.net.nz ---
I can have a look at backporting this to 23.11 for the next release
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
--- Comment #35 from Tiago Simões ---
(In reply to Lucas Gass from comment #34)
> (In reply to Tiago Simões from comment #33)
> > Hi! Would it be possible to backport it to 22.11? At our library, we've been
> > struggling with this p
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
--- Comment #34 from Lucas Gass ---
(In reply to Tiago Simões from comment #33)
> Hi! Would it be possible to backport it to 22.11? At our library, we've been
> struggling with this problem for a long time and I'm glad a solution was
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
Tiago Simões changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tmb.sim...@fct.unl.pt
--- Co
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
wainuiwitikap...@catalyst.net.nz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wainuiwiti
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
Fridolin Somers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version(s)|24.11.00,24.05.02 |24.11.00,24.05.02,23.11.07
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
Lucas Gass changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lu...@bywatersolutions.com
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
--- Comment #29 from Martin Renvoize ---
Thanks for all the hard work!
Pushed to main for the next 24.11.00 release as RM Assistant
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
Martin Renvoize changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version(s)||24.11.00
released
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
David Nind changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Patch doesn't apply |Passed QA
--
You are receivin
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
David Nind changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #161769|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
--- Comment #27 from Andreas Roussos ---
There's a single sign off in Comment 23 which appears to involve
two patches (instead of two separate sign offs, one per patch).
I think that's the reason the current set of patches (attachmen
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
--- Comment #26 from Katrin Fischer ---
That's alright, just easier for someone with the branch still around.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
--- Comment #25 from Marcel de Rooy ---
(In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #24)
> Hi Marcel, I tried to apply the patches in the attached sequence and the
> other way around, I always end up with:
>
> Apply? [(y)es, (n)o, (i)
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
Katrin Fischer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Passed QA |Patch doesn't apply
--- Co
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
Marcel de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #161768|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
Marcel de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Signed Off |Passed QA
--
You are rece
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
David Nind changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #161622|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
David Nind changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #161262|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
David Nind changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Needs Signoff |Signed Off
--
You are receivi
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
--- Comment #20 from Fridolin Somers ---
Thanks everyone for moving this dirty bug forward ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Koha-bugs maili
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
--- Comment #19 from Fridolin Somers ---
Created attachment 161622
-->
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=161622&action=edit
Bug 29539: (follow-up) remove tag_onesubject template
Also:
Restores the
Replac
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
Fridolin Somers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Failed QA |Needs Signoff
--
You are
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
--- Comment #18 from Fridolin Somers ---
(In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #17)
>
> This template contains a lot of additional logic. Could you or Fridolin
> explain what its purpose should have been?
This was a try to show
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
Marcel de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Signed Off |Failed QA
--- Comment #17
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
Marcel de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
QA Contact|testo...@bugs.koha-communit |m.de.r...@rijksmuseum.nl
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
David Nind changed:
What|Removed |Added
Text to go in the||This fixes the display of
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
David Nind changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #155604|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
David Nind changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Failed QA |Signed Off
--
You are receivi
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
--- Comment #14 from Andreas Roussos ---
(In reply to Thibault Keromnès from comment #12)
> Couldn't replicate either on a sandbox (display is ok whether it's 606$a and
> then 606$9 or 606$9 and then 606$a)
That's interesting, I actu
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
Andreas Roussos changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|21.05 |master
--- Comment #13 fr
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
Thibault Keromnès changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Needs Signoff |Failed QA
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
Andreas Roussos changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a.rous...@dataly.gr
--
Y
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
David Nind changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|oleon...@myacpl.org |gvera...@dataly.gr
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
--- Comment #10 from George Veranis ---
Created attachment 155604
-->
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=155604&action=edit
Bug 29539: UNIMARC: authority number in $9 displays for thesaurus controlled
field
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
George Veranis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |Needs Signoff
Patch comp
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
--- Comment #9 from Rafael Antonio ---
Use of $9 is very important for searching using Thesaurus (authority records).
May be we need to review XSLT but if Vearnis fix works we can wait for next
release we open to be solved
--
You a
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
--- Comment #8 from Fridolin Somers ---
Hi,
This is a very strange feature in UNIMARC XSLT that aim to look for several $9
in authority fields.
We should remove it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
--- Comment #7 from George Veranis ---
For the moment I solve that problem by using the template "tag_subject" from
the MARC21slimUtils.xsl and it works fine. and adding also the same codes and
subdivCodes from template tag_onesubjec
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
--- Comment #6 from Katrin Fischer ---
The display is rendered from the MARCXML record in the database using XSLT.
There are some replacements where authorised values are linked to fields, but
they should not be to blame here I think
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
--- Comment #5 from Rafael Antonio ---
I am not so sure if the problem is on XSLT file or any perl function that was
changed and this can be a side efect
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
Katrin Fischer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fridolin.som...@biblibre.co
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
--- Comment #3 from Rafael Antonio ---
I have tried to compare UNIMARCslimUtils release 20 and release 18 but it seems
there is no difference on template onesubject.
Testing intranet UNIMARCslimUtils on OPAC it does not work. So the
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
George Veranis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gvera...@dataly.gr
--- Com
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29539
Katrin Fischer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|UNIMARC: authority number |UNIMARC: authority number
54 matches
Mail list logo