https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
wainuiwitikap...@catalyst.net.nz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wainuiwiti
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
Arthur Suzuki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version(s)|23.05.00,22.11.03,22.05.10 |23.05.00,22.11.03,22.05.10,
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
Lucas Gass changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version(s)|23.05.00,22.11.03 |23.05.00,22.11.03,22.05.10
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
--- Comment #33 from Matt Blenkinsop ---
Nice work everyone!
Pushed to stable for 22.11.x
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Koha-bugs mailing
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
Matt Blenkinsop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version(s)|23.05.00|23.05.00,22.11.03
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
--- Comment #32 from Tomás Cohen Arazi ---
Pushed to master for 23.05.
Nice work everyone, thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Koha-bugs
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
Tomás Cohen Arazi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version(s)||23.05.00
release
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
--- Comment #31 from Jonathan Druart ---
(In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #29)
> Had an issue with the commit message being truncated. I only kept the
> summary now, the arguments from O'Reilly etc. are on this report.
Reat
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
Jonathan Druart changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #145608|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
--- Comment #29 from Marcel de Rooy ---
Had an issue with the commit message being truncated. I only kept the summary
now, the arguments from O'Reilly etc. are on this report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watchi
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
Marcel de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #145595|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
Marcel de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|BLOCKED |Passed QA
Patch complexi
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
Marcel de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Signed Off |BLOCKED
--- Comment #27 fr
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
Marcel de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
QA Contact|testo...@bugs.koha-communit |m.de.r...@rijksmuseum.nl
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
Jonathan Druart changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #145594|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
Jonathan Druart changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #145066|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
Jonathan Druart changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|In Discussion |Signed Off
--
You are re
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
Jonathan Druart changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||32393
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
--- Comment #24 from Marcel de Rooy ---
See also 32393. It also moves the ack before processing the job.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Koha
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
Marcel de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.koha-community
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
--- Comment #23 from David Cook ---
(In reply to Kyle M Hall from comment #21)
> I'd say we need to make the decision on where to ACK and the rest
> of the plan will follow from that.
Jonathan has put in the early ACK into bug 32393
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
--- Comment #22 from David Cook ---
(In reply to Kyle M Hall from comment #20)
> Nick asked me to post this
>
> https://stomp.github.io/stomp-specification-1.2.html#ACK
> ---
> ACK is used to acknowledge consumption of a message fro
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
--- Comment #21 from Kyle M Hall ---
(In reply to David Cook from comment #19)
> (In reply to David Cook from comment #18)
> > > I've been pondering having separate workers for polling and rabbit
> > > respectively. It would simplify
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
--- Comment #20 from Kyle M Hall ---
Nick asked me to post this
https://stomp.github.io/stomp-specification-1.2.html#ACK
---
ACK is used to acknowledge consumption of a message from a subscription using
client or client-individual a
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
--- Comment #19 from David Cook ---
(In reply to David Cook from comment #18)
> > I've been pondering having separate workers for polling and rabbit
> > respectively. It would simplify things a lot.
>
> That does sound interesting.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
--- Comment #18 from David Cook ---
(In reply to Tomás Cohen Arazi from comment #17)
> Regarding the ack discussion, it feels to me that many of our problems are
> related to the 'ack last' behavior. As you said, we have our own way
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
--- Comment #17 from Tomás Cohen Arazi ---
(In reply to Tomás Cohen Arazi from comment #11)
> (In reply to David Cook from comment #8)
> >
> > RabbitMQ isn't the wrong tool for the job
>
> The question is: are we better with just p
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
--- Comment #16 from David Cook ---
Another thought...
What about imposing limits on the size of batches? It's common to see this on
major commercial systems. Some social media sites will only allow you to choose
50 items for an ope
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
--- Comment #15 from David Cook ---
I'm curious what Kyle thinks about it. Whether he wants to update his patches,
or if folk want me to provide alternative patches.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
David Cook changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Needs Signoff |In Discussion
--- Comment #14
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
--- Comment #13 from David Cook ---
I was looking back at the origin of the database failover, and I think Julian
makes an interesting point at
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22417#c249
Maybe we could offe
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
--- Comment #12 from David Cook ---
(In reply to Tomás Cohen Arazi from comment #11)
> (In reply to David Cook from comment #8)
> >
> > RabbitMQ isn't the wrong tool for the job
>
> The question is: are we better with just polling?
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
Marcel de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.de.r...@rijksmuseum.nl
-
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
Tomás Cohen Arazi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tomasco...@gmail.com
--
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
--- Comment #10 from David Cook ---
But... as I note at
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27783#c64 my
libraries are not heavy users of background tasks at this point.
It sounds like Bywater are having the mo
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
--- Comment #9 from David Cook ---
(In reply to Nick Clemens from comment #7)
> I think for Koha we should ack as soon as we receive the job from RabbitMQ
>
> We maintain our own DB table for background jobs, and this is our source
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
--- Comment #8 from David Cook ---
(In reply to Kyle M Hall from comment #5)
> Considering batch record modifications are not atomic, I don't think that's
> necessarily a compelling argument.
I think that shows that batch modificati
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
Nick Clemens changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@bywatersolutions.com
--
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
--- Comment #6 from Kyle M Hall ---
> I can't see any scenario where either:
> A) We should ack before processing. We are stymying Koha's ability to do
> background processing by running extrememly long processes in serial with no
>
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
--- Comment #5 from Kyle M Hall ---
(In reply to David Cook from comment #4)
> If you were doing a big batch record modification and you suffered a power
> outage on the machine where the background job worker is running, then that
>
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
--- Comment #4 from David Cook ---
If you were doing a big batch record modification and you suffered a power
outage on the machine where the background job worker is running, then that
task can't be re-started since the RabbitMQ mes
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
David Cook changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dc...@prosentient.com.au
--- C
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Druart ---
I've tried this when working on bug 32481 but it didn't help.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Koha-bu
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
Kyle M Hall changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jonathan.druart+koha@gmail.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
Emily Lamancusa changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||emily.lamancusa@montgomery
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
--- Comment #1 from Kyle M Hall ---
Created attachment 145066
-->
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=145066&action=edit
Bug 32573: Send ACK message to RabbitMQ before handling the job
Splitting off this fu
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
Kyle M Hall changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |Needs Signoff
--
You are rec
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
Kyle M Hall changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|koha-b...@lists.koha-commun |k...@bywatersolutions.com
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
Kyle M Hall changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||32558
Referenced Bugs:
http
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
Kyle M Hall changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.koha-community
50 matches
Mail list logo