https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35920
--- Comment #21 from Jonathan Druart ---
(In reply to Tomás Cohen Arazi (tcohen) from comment #20)
> I like Jonathan's code, but we really need to decide if we want to keep
> Rabbit or not. I don't think we have discussed/voted it at
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35920
--- Comment #20 from Tomás Cohen Arazi (tcohen) ---
I like Jonathan's code, but we really need to decide if we want to keep Rabbit
or not. I don't think we have discussed/voted it at all. I understand RabbitMQ
has some advocates. I'm
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35920
Jonathan Druart changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |In Discussion
--
You are
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35920
--- Comment #19 from Jonathan Druart ---
(In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #18)
> I like the direction of travel here too.. but the NEW status doesn't really
> highlight if it's ready for testing.. feedback.. or what?
It's f
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35920
Martin Renvoize changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||martin.renvoize@ptfs-europ
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35920
--- Comment #17 from Marcel de Rooy ---
(In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #16)
> No opinion on it?
I happened to ignore the whole patch when I wrote the others. But viewing
diagonally, I would like to go that direction. So y
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35920
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Druart ---
No opinion on it?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Koha-bugs mailin
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35920
--- Comment #15 from Marcel de Rooy ---
(In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #14)
> (In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #13)
> > Comment on attachment 162951 [details] [review] [review]
> > Bug 35920: Centralize worker code
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35920
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Druart ---
(In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #13)
> Comment on attachment 162951 [details] [review]
> Bug 35920: Centralize worker code
>
> Abandoning it. Asked for feedback, received none, etc.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35920
Marcel de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #162952|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35920
Marcel de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #162951|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35920
Marcel de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|m.de.r...@rijksmuseum.nl|koha-b...@lists.koha-commun
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35920
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Druart ---
(In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #11)
> (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #1)
> > This is WIP. We need bug 35819 pushed first, then to clean this, it is not
> > very nice. But
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35920
--- Comment #11 from Marcel de Rooy ---
(In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #1)
> This is WIP. We need bug 35819 pushed first, then to clean this, it is not
> very nice. But at least it will prevent the code to be duplicated.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35920
Marcel de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@bywatersolutions.com
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35920
--- Comment #10 from Marcel de Rooy ---
Created attachment 162952
-->
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=162952&action=edit
Bug 35920: Use BackgroundWorker in es_indexer_daemon
This needs incorporating the
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35920
--- Comment #9 from Marcel de Rooy ---
Created attachment 162951
-->
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=162951&action=edit
Bug 35920: Centralize worker code
Test plan:
Confirm that running jobs still works
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35920
Marcel de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Patch complexity|--- |Small patch
--
You are re
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35920
Marcel de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||33898
Referenced Bugs:
h
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35920
--- Comment #8 from Marcel de Rooy ---
Giving this a try on top of 33898
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Koha-bugs mailing list
Koha-bugs@lis
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35920
Marcel de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|koha-b...@lists.koha-commun |m.de.r...@rijksmuseum.nl
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35920
--- Comment #7 from Marcel de Rooy ---
(In reply to Tomás Cohen Arazi from comment #6)
> (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Tomás Cohen Arazi from comment #3)
> > > I like the concept.
> > >
> > > Given t
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35920
Marcel de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||35092
Referenced Bugs:
h
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35920
--- Comment #6 from Tomás Cohen Arazi ---
(In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #5)
> (In reply to Tomás Cohen Arazi from comment #3)
> > I like the concept.
> >
> > Given the discussion Marcel is driving around rabbit vs. polli
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35920
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Druart ---
(In reply to Tomás Cohen Arazi from comment #3)
> I like the concept.
>
> Given the discussion Marcel is driving around rabbit vs. polling, why not
> create some base class and then different
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35920
--- Comment #4 from Marcel de Rooy ---
(In reply to Tomás Cohen Arazi from comment #3)
> I like the concept.
>
> Given the discussion Marcel is driving around rabbit vs. polling, why not
> create some base class and then different c
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35920
--- Comment #3 from Tomás Cohen Arazi ---
I like the concept.
Given the discussion Marcel is driving around rabbit vs. polling, why not
create some base class and then different classes implementing each
communication mechanism? Tha
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35920
Jonathan Druart changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dc...@prosentient.com.au,
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35920
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Druart ---
Created attachment 161544
-->
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=161544&action=edit
Bug 35920: Centralize code from workers
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35920
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Druart ---
This is WIP. We need bug 35819 pushed first, then to clean this, it is not very
nice. But at least it will prevent the code to be duplicated.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are t
30 matches
Mail list logo
