[Koha-bugs] [Bug 36054] Setting MARC 005 as not required causes save error in Advanced Editor and not Basic Editor

2024-04-26 Thread bugzilla-daemon--- via Koha-bugs
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36054 Phil Ringnalda changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Koha-bugs] [Bug 36054] Setting MARC 005 as not required causes save error in Advanced Editor and not Basic Editor

2024-04-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon--- via Koha-bugs
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36054 Phil Ringnalda changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@chetcolibrary.org

[Koha-bugs] [Bug 36054] Setting MARC 005 as not required causes save error in Advanced Editor and not Basic Editor

2024-02-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon--- via Koha-bugs
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36054 --- Comment #3 from Marcel de Rooy --- (In reply to Esther Melander from comment #2) > Missing 005's are also happening with migrated dated or large batch imports. These also go via AddBiblio and ModBiblio. So should be fine with

[Koha-bugs] [Bug 36054] Setting MARC 005 as not required causes save error in Advanced Editor and not Basic Editor

2024-02-09 Thread bugzilla-daemon--- via Koha-bugs
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36054 --- Comment #2 from Esther Melander --- Missing 005's are also happening with migrated dated or large batch imports. Yes, touch all biblios can fix the missing 005. Does bug 35993 prevent the ability to delete the tag in the

[Koha-bugs] [Bug 36054] Setting MARC 005 as not required causes save error in Advanced Editor and not Basic Editor

2024-02-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon--- via Koha-bugs
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36054 Marcel de Rooy changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Koha-bugs] [Bug 36054] Setting MARC 005 as not required causes save error in Advanced Editor and not Basic Editor

2024-02-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon--- via Koha-bugs
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36054 --- Comment #1 from Marcel de Rooy --- Please see bug 35993. This should ensure that we always store 005 in new or modified records. (Note that most records without 005 are coming from ACQ.) I guess that it will also resolve this