https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
Nick Clemens changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #73 from Nick Clemens ---
Created attachment 118460
-->
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=118460&action=edit
Bug 9921: Remove option of 'incremental' and add tests
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
Nick Clemens changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.koha-community
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #72 from Nick Clemens ---
Created attachment 118425
-->
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=118425&action=edit
Bug 9921 - Make it possible to force 001 = biblionumber
Field 001 is controlled by a
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
Nick Clemens changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #19153|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
Katrin Fischer changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.koha-community
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #70 from Katrin Fischer ---
(In reply to Simon Hohl from comment #69)
> Hey Katrin,
>
> thanks for answering.
>
> My Perl skills are somewhat lackluster, so I'd be interested in a proof of
> concept (i.e. your script). ;
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #69 from Simon Hohl ---
Hey Katrin,
thanks for answering.
My Perl skills are somewhat lackluster, so I'd be interested in a proof of
concept (i.e. your script). ;)
Kind regards,
Simon
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #68 from Katrin Fischer ---
The ...AV.pl catalouging plugins are based on a counter in an authorised value.
The original catalouging plugin is used for generating stocknumbers, but could
also be adapted to be used for gene
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #67 from Simon Hohl ---
I just realized: biblio_metadata.id is not the system number in 001. So you
would need the use the search index somehow?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
Simon Hohl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simon.h...@dainst.org
--- Comme
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
David Cook changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dc...@prosentient.com.au
--- Co
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #64 from Katrin Fischer ---
You can query and output the content of the field without an authorised value.
Did you take a look at the sql library on the wiki? Maybe a topic for a
different channel, like IRC or mailing lis
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #63 from emj...@pa.net ---
(In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #62)
> I understand, just trying to prevent you from doing something that might
> break stuff (because people have gone there before). I can't tell you why
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #62 from Katrin Fischer ---
I understand, just trying to prevent you from doing something that might break
stuff (because people have gone there before). I can't tell you why for Koha
999c was chosen in the beginning, but
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #61 from emj...@pa.net ---
(In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #60)
> The biblionumber is not a sequentially created number of the application,
> but it's the primary key assigned by the database. That's why it will o
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #60 from Katrin Fischer ---
> Thus, I am wondering what it is about the 999$c that permits an
> auto-generated unique identifier to be created when it can not be created in
> the 001, and if anything can be done to either
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #59 from emj...@pa.net ---
(In reply to paxed from comment #58)
>
> 001 alone does not guarantee uniqueness. 001 and 003 together should be
> globally unique. If 001 is changed, then 003 should be changed to match the
> or
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
paxed changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pasi.kalli...@joensuu.fi
--- Comment
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
emj...@pa.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||emj...@pa.net
--- Comment #57
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
rkui...@roundrocktexas.gov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|rkui...@roundrocktexas.gov |
--
You are rec
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
rkui...@roundrocktexas.gov changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|http://bugs.koha-community. |
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
rkui...@roundrocktexas.gov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rkui...@roundrock
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
Patrick Robitaille changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||patrick.robitai...@ccsr.
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #56 from Magnus Enger ---
(In reply to Mirko Tietgen from comment #54)
> This would need quite a rebase. It would still be a useful feature.
>
> The bug that is mentioned as a blocker has not gotten any update in 3 years
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #55 from Marcel de Rooy ---
(In reply to Mirko Tietgen from comment #54)
> This would need quite a rebase. It would still be a useful feature.
>
> The bug that is mentioned as a blocker has not gotten any update in 3 year
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
Mirko Tietgen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mi...@abunchofthings.net
---
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
M. de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|10480 |
--
You are receiving this mail
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
Bug 9921 depends on bug 10480, which changed state.
Bug 10480 Summary: Cataloging plugins without redefining
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10480
What|Removed |Added
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
giuseppe.angile...@ct.infn.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||giuseppe.angile
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
marjorie barry-vila changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marjorie.barry-v...@ccsr
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #53 from Zeno Tajoli ---
The problem is that sequence number engine is blocked (for mysqlism problems).
I think we can that the low level fruit (force 001 = biblionumber and a plugin
to insert it if want to choose) an wait
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #52 from M. de Rooy ---
(In reply to Zeno Tajoli from comment #51)
> In fact the patch is blocked by discussion on Koha::Sequence (bug 10454).
> Is it Ok if i rewrite the patch without the incremental option ?
> I will inse
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
Zeno Tajoli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Patch doesn't apply |In Discussion
C
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
Bug 9921 depends on bug 10480, which changed state.
Bug 10480 Summary: Cataloging plugins without redefining
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10480
What|Removed |Added
---
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
I'm just a bot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Needs Signoff |Patch doesn't apply
--- Comm
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
I'm just a bot changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||git...@bugs.koha-community.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
M. Tompsett changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||http://bugs.koha-community.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
M. Tompsett changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mtomp...@hotmail.com
--- Commen
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
Nuño López Ansótegui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #19170|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #46 from M. de Rooy ---
(In reply to comment #45)
> In the original context though, this bug plus recent discussion on #koha
> about table-locking issues with fixup_cardnumber is making me think that
> what we *really* nee
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #45 from Galen Charlton ---
(In reply to comment #43)
> But note that last_insert_id may be more portable, it is considered less
> reliable than e.g. using MySQL with mysql_insertid.
> Since AddBiblio relies on it, I would
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #44 from M. de Rooy ---
Found this quote somewhere in context of using mod_perl:
As long as you get it from the same $sth, it's going to be thread safe (i.e.
doesn't matter if another process inserts before you call insert
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #43 from M. de Rooy ---
(In reply to comment #40)
> Marcel - not sure, but is the LAST_INSERT_ID a MySQLism? I seem to remember
> a discussion in IRC about it, but of course... I can't remember enough to
> explain why I hav
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #42 from M. de Rooy ---
(In reply to comment #41)
> If they have their own 001 plugin, i think that they should be able to
> control their frameworks and differ if they have the default plugin 001 in
> Koha or not.
>
> Wha
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #41 from Nuño López Ansótegui ---
(In reply to comment #39)
> (In reply to comment #36)
> > > I am wondering if it is dangerous to set the plugin for one framework and
> > > not for another (could be the case)?
>
> Since y
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #40 from Katrin Fischer ---
I think we should only update the database when there are no existing plugins
for any of the 001. But when we do update, it should loop over all frameworks
to ensure it's a consistent change.
M
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
M. de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
QA Contact||m.de.r...@rijksmuseum.nl
--
You
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #39 from M. de Rooy ---
(In reply to comment #36)
> > I am wondering if it is dangerous to set the plugin for one framework and
> > not for another (could be the case)?
Since your pref is OFF by default, this is initially
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #38 from M. de Rooy ---
Nuno,
I came across this SQL construct. It makes the use of a exclusive row level
lock not needed:
UPDATE tablename SET counter = LAST_INSERT_ID( counter + 1) WHERE id=xxx
SELECT LAST_INSERT_ID();
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #37 from Nuño López Ansótegui ---
It's no problem to use other plugin or not using of this plugin, the field is
not autofilled or will be filled with a number .
If the field 001 is blank will be updated with incremental bi
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
Nuño López Ansótegui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Failed QA |Needs Signoff
--- Comm
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
Nuño López Ansótegui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #19156|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
M. de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Needs Signoff |Failed QA
--- Comment #33 from M
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #34 from M. de Rooy ---
I made some changes in bug 10480 that I incorporated in your patch too.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Koh
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
M. de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #19099|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #31 from M. de Rooy ---
Created attachment 19153
-->
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=19153&action=edit
Bug 9921: Followup for installer languages
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
M. de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||10480
--
You are receiving this
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #30 from M. de Rooy ---
(In reply to comment #29)
> (In reply to comment #28)
> > (In reply to comment #26)
> > > Created attachment 19099 [details] [review] [review] [review]
> > > Bug 9921 - Make it possible to force 001
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #29 from Nuño López Ansótegui ---
(In reply to comment #28)
> (In reply to comment #26)
> > Created attachment 19099 [details] [review] [review]
> > Bug 9921 - Make it possible to force 001 = biblionumber
> >
> > 'catalogu
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #28 from M. de Rooy ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> Created attachment 19099 [details] [review]
> Bug 9921 - Make it possible to force 001 = biblionumber
>
> 'cataloguing/value_builder/marc21_field_001.pl' has been moved t
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #27 from M. de Rooy ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> I think the RM's opinion on this was clearly stated and I tend to agree with
> him ;) We leave the Modern::Perl in, but don't require to fix all the warns
> immediately.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
Nuño López Ansótegui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #19062|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
Katrin Fischer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||katrin.fisc...@bsz-bw.de
---
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #24 from M. de Rooy ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> Ok, I wait, thanks.
You do no longer need to wait. Click bug 10480 :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #23 from Nuño López Ansótegui ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> (In reply to comment #19)
> > Created attachment 19062 [details] [review] [review]
> > Bug 9921 - Make it possible to force 001 = biblionumber
> Thanks for doing
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #22 from M. de Rooy ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> (In reply to comment #17)
> > (In reply to comment #16)
> > > New code *must* enable the warnings pragma; please use Modern::Perl.
> >
> > This could still be a problem w
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #21 from M. de Rooy ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> Created attachment 19062 [details] [review]
> Bug 9921 - Make it possible to force 001 = biblionumber
Thanks for doing so.
> Added 'use Modern::Perl;' in cataloguing/valu
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #20 from M. de Rooy ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> This idea (creating a sequence engine) is worth elevating to a new
> enhancement bug. There's been some chatter on #koha the past few days about
> this in the context of
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
Nuño López Ansótegui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Failed QA |Needs Signoff
--
You
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
Nuño López Ansótegui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #18862|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #18 from Galen Charlton ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> (In reply to comment #16)
> > New code *must* enable the warnings pragma; please use Modern::Perl.
>
> This could still be a problem with the way the plugins work in
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #17 from M. de Rooy ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> New code *must* enable the warnings pragma; please use Modern::Perl.
This could still be a problem with the way the plugins work in the marc editor.
The routine is redefi
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #16 from Galen Charlton ---
Comment on attachment 18862
--> http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=18862
Bug 9921 - Make it possible to force 001 = biblionumber
Review of attachment 18862:
-->
(http
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
Galen Charlton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gmcha...@gmail.com
--- Comme
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
M. de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Needs Signoff |Failed QA
--
You are receiving
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #14 from M. de Rooy ---
Nuño:
Thanks for your patch adjustments and the effort to synchronize all language
files in this regard.
But I still have some thoughts about this:
1) I think we cannot force the plugin at upgrade t
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #13 from Nuño López Ansótegui ---
Created attachment 18863
-->
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=18863&action=edit
autoControNumber preview
Field 001 is controlled by a system preference, which w
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
Nuño López Ansótegui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #18707|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #11 from M. de Rooy ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Does it apply?
Yes, it applies. Will try to test later, though..
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #10 from Nuño López Ansótegui ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > You attached the wrong patch perhaps??
>
> No wait..
Does it apply?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #9 from M. de Rooy ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> You attached the wrong patch perhaps??
No wait..
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
M. de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.de.r...@rijksmuseum.nl
--- Com
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #7 from Nuño López Ansótegui ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Interesting patch! Few questions:
>
> my $incrementalCN=C4::Context->preference('incrementalControlNumber');
> my $sth = $dbh->prepare(q{UPDATE systempreferences
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
Nuño López Ansótegui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #18701|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #5 from M. de Rooy ---
Interesting patch! Few questions:
my $incrementalCN=C4::Context->preference('incrementalControlNumber');
my $sth = $dbh->prepare(q{UPDATE systempreferences SET value = ? WHERE variable
= 'incrementa
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
Nuño López Ansótegui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #18700|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
Nuño López Ansótegui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16896|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
--- Comment #2 from Paul A ---
Created attachment 16896
-->
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=16896&action=edit
.tar for serialized 001 field
See bug 9921
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are wa
http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9921
Paul A changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pau...@aandc.org
--- Comment #1 from
90 matches
Mail list logo
