Good morning!
Thanks for the feedback. I added a note to the RFC about embedded
holdings in bibliographic records. They cover a lot of needs and we have
considered embedding the holdings, but there are issues if there are
multiple holdings.
Regards,
Ere
Sebastian Hierl kirjoitti 5.4.2018 kl
For what it's worth, we also use Latin script language and find the results
more relevant without a star, or at least with the queries of 17.05 :).
2018-04-04 13:10 GMT+02:00 Nick Clemens :
> Interesting, yes, the star was added to support auto_truncation and
> enabled by default. For languages u
Oh there is also another way : use ~/.config/git/ingore
From https://git-scm.com/docs/gitignore#_description
And thanks to Julian Maurice our GIT Jedi ;)
Le 27/03/2018 à 17:58, Fridolin SOMERS a écrit :
Hi,
Since Bug 20267 "Add basic .gitignore", there is a .gitignore in sources
under GIT ve
I haven't looked at the RFC but I thought about MARC holdings record support at
one point too. It'll have consequences for the 952 which gets embedded in the
MARC record during indexing for Zebra...
David Cook
Systems Librarian
Prosentient Systems
72/330 Wattle St
Ultimo, NSW 2007
Australia
Off
Hi David,
take a look at the RFC, the suggestion is to make holdings records an
optional feature. 952 would not be affected.
Katrin
On 06.04.2018 01:43, David Cook wrote:
I haven't looked at the RFC but I thought about MARC holdings record support at
one point too. It'll have consequences
