Or merge biblio and biblioitems ;-)
El sáb., 17 nov. 2018 a las 16:41, Barton Chittenden (<
bar...@bywatersolutions.com>) escribió:
> Just out of curiosity, why does biblioitemnumber exist? There should be a
> one-to-one relationship between biblio records and biblioitem records ...
> so why not
Just out of curiosity, why does biblioitemnumber exist? There should be a
one-to-one relationship between biblio records and biblioitem records ...
so why not use biblionumber as the primary key for biblioitems?
--Barton
___
Koha-devel mailing list