oha-community.org>] *On
Behalf Of *Marcel de Rooy
*Sent:* Friday, 25 August 2017 4:29 PM
*To:* Koha-devel
<mailto:koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org>
*Subject:* [Koha-devel] [SIGNED_OFF] labels
Hi all,
I would favor stopping the us
t;
>> Australia
>>
>>
>>
>> Office: 02 9212 0899
>>
>> Direct: 02 8005 0595
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* koha-devel-boun...@lists.koha-community.org [
>> mailto:koha-devel-boun...@lists.koha-community.org
>> ] *On Behalf Of *Marcel de
&
lia
>
>
>
> Office: 02 9212 0899
>
> Direct: 02 8005 0595
>
>
>
> *From:* koha-devel-boun...@lists.koha-community.org [
> mailto:koha-devel-boun...@lists.koha-community.org
> ] *On Behalf Of *Marcel de
> Rooy
> *Sent:* Friday, 25 August 2017 4:29 PM
> *To:* K
-community.org] *On Behalf Of
*Marcel de Rooy
*Sent:* Friday, 25 August 2017 4:29 PM
*To:* Koha-devel
*Subject:* [Koha-devel] [SIGNED_OFF] labels
Hi all,
I would favor stopping the use of adding [SIGNED_OFF] labels to
patches when it is not strictly needed (which normally is the case).
Only when
: Friday, 25 August 2017 4:29 PM
To: Koha-devel
Subject: [Koha-devel] [SIGNED_OFF] labels
Hi all,
I would favor stopping the use of adding [SIGNED_OFF] labels to patches when
it is not strictly needed (which normally is the case).
Only when (exceptionally) a few patches are signed and a few are not
Hi all,
I would favor stopping the use of adding [SIGNED_OFF] labels to patches when it
is not strictly needed (which normally is the case).
Only when (exceptionally) a few patches are signed and a few are not on one
report, I could see its use.
At this moment they need to be obsoleted manuall
