On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Liz Rea wrote:
> How would you like patches labeled that apply for 3.2.x only (when they
> inevitably diverge)?
>
> [3.2.x bug ] [Signed Off] Commit message? Some other way?
>
>
That's fine.
> I wish to do your bidding! ;)
>
>
I'm glad to see we've come to a
How would you like patches labeled that apply for 3.2.x only (when they
inevitably diverge)?
[3.2.x bug ] [Signed Off] Commit message? Some other way?
I wish to do your bidding! ;)
Liz
On Nov 10, 2010, at 3:30 PM, Chris Nighswonger wrote:
> During the general IRC meeting today, a questi
During the general IRC meeting today, a question came up concerning
how I plan to push patches to 3.2.x. Here is the general procedure I
intend to follow, but am certainly reserving my right to change it as
necessary.
1. The general policy will be to cherry-pick/merge patches from HEAD
as they app
