Would one of you please be kind enough to save my sanity (if I have any left)?
Our cataloguers are doing a sterling job ridding our db of duplicate 001
fields, but every time they do a simple edit of *only* the 001, both OPAC
and staff-admin page find TWO absolutely identical (biblio, barcode,
Paul,
Would one of you please be kind enough to save my sanity (if I have any
> left)?
>
> Our cataloguers are doing a sterling job ridding our db of duplicate 001
> fields, but every time they do a simple edit of *only* the 001, both OPAC
> and staff-admin page find TWO absolutely identical (bibl
Dear Jared,
Many thanks for the reply. Comments|questions interspersed below:
At 04:22 PM 10/17/2012 -0400, Jared Camins-Esakov wrote:
Our cataloguers are doing a sterling job ridding our db of duplicate 001
fields, but every time they do a simple edit of *only* the 001, both OPAC
and staff-ad
Dear Jared,
Many thanks for the reply. Comments|questions interspersed below:
At 04:22 PM 10/17/2012 -0400, Jared Camins-Esakov wrote:
Our cataloguers are doing a sterling job ridding our db of duplicate 001
fields, but every time they do a simple edit of *only* the 001, both OPAC
and staff-ad
At 04:22 PM 10/17/2012 -0400, it was written:
Paul,
Isn't this the problem you were trying to solve to begin with?
Progress! Thanks all around. After a mini-marathon our cataloguers have
edited *all* duplicate 001 fields.
Zebra -z doesn't keep up with 001, so for our plug-in to work I had to
