At 11:48 PM 3/25/2013 -0300, Tomas Cohen Arazi wrote:
I belive install docs should be qa-ed for every release and cleaned.
Regarding OpenSuSE i know a few that run Koha flawlessly on it. At leat
3.6 i think. The main problem is there are not many volunteers to take on
the job of testing and
I belive install docs should be qa-ed for every release and cleaned.
Regarding OpenSuSE i know a few that run Koha flawlessly on it. At leat 3.6
i think. The main problem is there are not many volunteers to take on the
job of testing and rewriting.
I've never used dpkg on a rpm-based distro, did
Greetings,
I belive install docs should be qa-ed for every release and cleaned.
+1 – Yes, if the install instructions were QA-ed each release, the “origin” vs.
“origin/3.10.x” would not be a concern of mine.
Regarding OpenSuSE i know a few that run Koha flawlessly on it. At leat 3.6 i
...@prosentient.com.au
-Original Message-
From: Mark Tompsett mtomp...@hotmail.com
To: koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
Subject: [Koha-devel] OpenSUSE
Message-ID: blu172-ds2ecfe02287210bc93eb8bc6...@phx.gbl
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=utf-8;
reply-type=original
: [Koha-devel] OpenSUSE
Message-ID: blu172-ds5cff59527fd5bf60cd5fac6...@phx.gbl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Greetings,
I belive install docs should be qa-ed for every release and cleaned.
+1 ? Yes, if the install instructions were QA-ed each release, the ?origin?
vs. ?origin/3.10.x
Greetings,
A person I know was telling me about a project they have in OpenSUSE. So, I
downloaded it. I'm installing it. And then I thought, Hey, does Koha work
on this?
The installation is downloading RPM's after all. So, I looked on the Wiki
for OpenSUSE.
I thought my Ubuntu tarball
