Hi,
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 6:22 AM, Frederic Demians <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the way, isn't memcached out of proportion. mod_perl has
> session/global variables. That would be enough to cache syspref and
> other application-level variables.
We should experiment, of course. Even if mod_pe
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Paul POULAIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - memcache some other tables, that are often used : branches, itemtypes,
> auth_types, biblio_framework, categories, cities, ethnicity, opac_news
In particular, caching the entire set of active MARC frameworks would
be
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Paul POULAIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you agree with this proposal, i'll add it to RFC for 3.2
I agree with pursuing both memcached and mod_perl for 3.2.
Regards,
Galen
--
Galen Charlton
Koha Application Developer
LibLime
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
p: 1-888-56
> mod_perl = x3 improvement
> memcache = x2 improvement
>
> so :
>
> both = x6 improvement
>
> lol. I agree that's only theory.
>
> A quick question again : did someone experiment mod_perl recently ? it
> used to work pretty well something like 1 year ago.
It works perfectly for OPAC. I didn't te
Andrew Moore a écrit :
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 3:06 AM, Paul POULAIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I suggest that we add memcached option to Koha 3.2.
>
> I think this is a great idea.
>
> How will this interact with mod_perl if we were to add a mod_perl
> option for 3.2 (or beyond)?
mod_perl =
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 3:06 AM, Paul POULAIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suggest that we add memcached option to Koha 3.2.
I think this is a great idea.
How will this interact with mod_perl if we were to add a mod_perl
option for 3.2 (or beyond)?
-Andy
Chris C. did some tests with memcached and it seems it's a great way to
improve perfs of Koha.
However, it requires some code changes. And an additionnal software
installed on the server (memcached is provided on debian, and mandriva
-contrib-, so it's probably not a true problem)
I suggest th
