>
>        WW News Service Digest #169
>
> 1) U.S./NATO steal Yugoslav elections
>    by "WW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 2) Illusion & reality: What happens when imperialists get their way
>    by "WW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 3) Int'l observers condemn U.S./EU interference
>    by "WW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 4) In their own words
>    by "WW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 5) Class struggle, parties & elections
>    by "WW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 6) Thousands in Prague say: 'Smash the IMF'
>    by "WW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>
>-------------------------
>Via Workers World News Service
>Reprinted from the Oct. 5, 2000
>issue of Workers World newspaper
>-------------------------
>
>U.S./NATO STEAL YUGOSLAV ELECTIONS
>Soft Money and hard threats
>
>By Sara Flounders
>
>On Sept. 26 the State Election Commission in Yugoslavia
>announced the results of the Sept. 24 elections. The
>candidate backed by the U.S. government and the European
>Union, Vojislav Kostunica, received 48 percent of the vote
>to President Slobodan Milosevic's 40 percent.
>
>Since neither candidate received more than 50 percent, a run-
>off election has been set for Oct. 8.
>
>Kostunica's immediate reaction was to reject participation
>in a run-off election and demand that Milosevic concede
>defeat. Bill Clinton, Britain's Foreign Secretary Robin Cook
>and other NATO leaders who bombed Yugoslavia in 1999 also
>demanded Milosevic concede.
>
>The first point for the whole international movement that
>opposed NATO's war against Yugoslavia to keep in mind is
>that the Yugoslav elections were not "free and fair."
>Imperialism stole the election through its blatant pressure,
>bribery and interference.
>
>The elections raise a vital question. Will Yugoslavia be
>turned over to the Western banks and corporations? Will the
>assets of industrial enterprises be broken up and sold off,
>as they have been in every other country in Eastern Europe,
>Russia and the former Soviet Republics? Will the majority of
>the population be relegated to living below the poverty
>line?
>
>The Sept. 24 elections involved three layers of voting.
>Besides the presidential vote, there were also municipal
>elections, in which the U.S.-backed opposition won many
>cities and towns.
>
>There was also an election for the Yugoslav Federal
>Parliament. The coalition of the United Left, the Socialist
>Party and the SP's sister party in Montenegro won a strong
>majority of both houses. In Montenegro it was unopposed, as
>the pro-Western government abstained from the election.
>Under Yugoslav law, Parliament has more rights than the
>president and directs the government, electing the prime
>minister.
>
>But a setback for Milosevic in the presidential election
>puts more at risk than the future of one individual. He was
>the main target of the war carried out by U.S. and NATO--the
>imperialist world powers--and because of that he has come to
>symbolize Yugoslav resistance. In addition, he was at the
>center of the coalition of forces that led Yugoslavia during
>the 78 days of bombing.
>
>All the social gains of an independent country that had
>broken free of imperialist enslavement and held out during
>years of encirclement and war are now endangered.
>
>WESTERN INTERFERENCE DISTORTED ELECTIONS
>
>In this election the U.S. and European Union governments
>used every possible dirty trick, corrupt practice and
>payoff, and then bragged about them. Threats of bombing,
>promises to end nine years of sanctions, intimidation and
>military maneuvers heightened the tension.
>
>On election day the Pentagon and Croatia held their largest
>joint military exercises ever--a joint landing on an island
>in the Adriatic near Montenegro, part of Yugoslavia, to
>simulate an invasion. Fifteen British war ships have now
>moved into the Mediterranean. A U.S. aircraft carrier in the
>Adriatic Sea has moved closer to Montenegro.
>
>The major media here--the New York Times on Sept. 20 and the
>Washington Post on Sept. 19--have described in detail the
>exact amounts funneled into the opposition parties, radio
>and TV stations and newspapers. The U.S. Congress publicly
>voted on $77 million in open interference. Then on Sept. 25,
>the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill to send
>another $105 million to aid anti-Milosevic forces in Serbia
>and Montenegro.
>
>These articles describe suitcases of cash handed over at the
>border, endless supplies of computers, fax machines, cell
>phones and the trainers to use them. These goods have been
>passed to the opposition through front organizations, NGOs
>and media outlets.
>
>Weeks before the election, Western-funded polling
>organizations announced that Kostunica would win a sweeping
>victory. For the West's media monopoly beaming into
>Yugoslavia, there were only two options. Either Milosevic
>would lose or there would be massive fraud.
>
>The U.S. State Department announced that even if Milosevic
>won by overwhelming odds, Washington would refuse to accept
>the results.
>
>HOW SOULD MOVEMENT EVALUATE THESE EVENTS?
>
>Those who opposed NATO bombing in 1999 and all the militant
>activists who have taken on the International Monetary Fund,
>World Bank, globalization and sweatshops have a stake in
>what happens next in Yugoslavia.
>
>Are they ready to stand in solidarity with whatever steps
>are necessary to keep another country from being forced
>under the boot of the IMF and World Bank?
>
>Washington, London, Paris and Berlin have openly intervened
>and bragged of it. In the face of these admissions, those in
>office in Yugoslavia have every right to void the elections
>and disqualify the opposition.
>
>In the United States, France, Britain or Germany, would such
>an election have been allowed to continue? In the United
>States no political organization is permitted to accept
>funds from another government for political purposes unless
>it publicly registers as an agent of a foreign power. The
>U.S. ruling class is determined that only it should control
>the electoral process.
>
>Any U.S. politician found accepting contributions, bribes or
>payments of any kind from a foreign government is disgraced,
>attacked and could face criminal indictment.
>
>Just the allegation that the Clinton administration accepted
>a contribution from an ethnically Chinese businessperson who
>might have had contact with China sent every politician
>running for cover.
>
>CORRUPTION AND TREASON
>
>It is important to recognize that the Yugoslav government
>has the moral right to nullify this election on the basis of
>outrageous outside interference. It has every right to
>refuse to proceed with further elections under conditions of
>war, sanctions and occupation.
>
>The Parliament has every right to establish a criminal
>inquiry into the funding sources of the opposition.
>Government prosecutors have every right to indict and jail
>the politicians and publications that have corrupted the
>election process.
>
>The masses have every right to go into the streets and
>denounce the opposition parties and publications as agents
>of a foreign power.
>
>Kostunica, until now a minor politician considered a Serb
>nationalist with a long history of anti-Communism,
>consistently maintains that he has not accepted any money
>from the West. He has even criticized the NATO bombing and
>sanctions. No Yugoslav politician could win significant
>votes if seen as a NATO stooge.
>
>It may be true that he personally has not pocketed any
>money. But Kostunica has surrounded himself with political
>parties and organizations that are toadies to the NATO
>countries. His whole campaign has been publicized by radio
>and television stations and newspapers wholly and openly
>financed by grants from Washington and Berlin.
>
>He is supported by the U.S. and European imperialist powers
>because his political program, even if it criticizes NATO,
>embraces the very policies that NATO is demanding. He is the
>easiest of the politicians to make into a pawn because he
>has no personal base. He is the candidate of a bloc of 18
>small feuding political parties that have no common
>interests or ideology. They are united only by opposition to
>the government and their willingness to accept foreign
>funds.
>
>U.S. ENGINEERED COUPS AND COUNTERREVOLUTIONS
>
>The big U.S. monopolies and banks and Washington itself have
>never accepted an election as "free and fair" if it put
>their class interests in danger or brought the masses onto
>the scene. Since the end of World War II the U.S. has
>organized the overthrow of more than 50 governments.
>
>In Chile in 1973 the CIA organized a military coup to drown
>the progressive legally elected government in blood. It did
>the same in Iran in 1953 and in Guatemala in 1954.
>
>In 1990 the U.S. orchestrated the overthrow of the
>Sandinistas in Nicaragua. Washington had cobbled together a
>20-party coalition whose only aim was to overthrow the
>government and restore the old propertied class. It promised
>to end the "Contra" war and sanctions and provide massive
>aid if the popular Sandinistas were defeated.
>
>In this situation, much like the one today in Yugoslavia,
>Washington succeeded in manipulating the election to drive
>out the Sandinistas. But the U.S. never came through with
>the aid, and now some of the lowest-paid sweatshops in the
>world operate in the Trade Zones" of Nicaragua.
>
>'FREE ELECTIONS' IN A COUNTRY UNDER SIEGE?
>
>Yugoslavia, like Nicaragua, illustrates the dangers of
>holding an election in the midst of an unrelenting war,
>sanctions and occupation of part of the country by foreign
>armies. With their dominance of the world media, the lure of
>material goods, the bribes and the threat of further
>punishment, these powers were able to reach right into the
>country.
>
>President Milosevic was trying to get a mandate by calling a
>vote when the opposition seemed divided, weak, discredited.
>But the imperialists quickly strengthened them using tactics
>refined over decades of interventions.
>
>Yugoslavia, a small, beleaguered country maneuvering to
>survive, has allowed dozens of openly pro-imperialist
>parties to maintain offices, staff, publish newspapers,
>organize and to participate in elections. These concessions
>have only further emboldened the enemies of the Yugoslav
>workers.
>
>Even though the imperialists complained that they were not
>allowed to monitor the elections, hundreds of foreigners did
>come in as election observers and certified that they were
>"free and fair"--that the government honestly and legally
>abided by all election procedures. But this shifted
>attention from the actual fraud taking place: the massive
>intervention and intimidation by imperialism.
>
>The political opposition was allowed to engage in
>practically unrestrained acceptance of foreign assistance,
>advice and media hype. The whole process was corrupted by an
>army of Western advisers and pollsters.
>
>WILL U.S./NATO FORCES SUCCEED?
>
>Reports from election observers and even the big-business
>media show there is a hard core of working-class support for
>Milosevic from those who see him as a defender of the
>country against NATO. Even among those who naively voted for
>Kostunica out of anger against Milosevic, there are many who
>want to resist Western imperialism.
>
>The question facing the Yugoslav masses now is will the
>Western multinationals, on the basis of this election
>distorted by intervention, be able to capture the state
>apparatus and open the door to super-exploitation?
>
>Will the enemy that failed to break Yugoslavia's resistance
>with 78 days of bombing be able to take over by manipulation
>of an election--or will the government be able to resist?
>
>If the left organizations and patriotic parties in
>Yugoslavia resist, will the progressive and working-class
>and anti-war movements in the West defend them against an
>inevitable propaganda blitz from the West and a possible new
>military campaign?
>
>WHAT CAN BE DONE?
>
>One contribution to this effort could be a Commission of
>Inquiry to examine the corrupting role that the U.S.
>government, the European Union, their NATO military arm and
>their international financial organizations played in the
>Yugoslav election.
>
>This Inquiry could gather and publicize information on these
>institutions' efforts to subvert and overthrow the Yugoslav
>government. It could also gather information on the open and
>secret funding of political parties, organizations and
>publications by U.S. government agencies.
>
>The Inquiry could deepen international understanding of
>Yugoslavia's problem by incorporating testimony and reports
>on U.S. intervention in the internal affairs of other
>governments. This would include the overthrow of other
>popular governments in Guatemala, Panama, Chile, Iran and
>Indonesia and also intervention in elections in Italy,
>Haiti, Nicaragua, Guyana and others.
>
>Activists in other NATO countries could organize their own
>Commissions of Inquiry and public hearings to examine how
>this latest intervention violated their laws. Similar
>information came to light earlier when hearings and
>tribunals in many countries put U.S. and NATO leaders on
>trial for war crimes against Yugoslavia.
>
>The importance of international solidarity should never be
>underestimated. Yugoslavia must not stand alone.
>
>- END -
>
>(Copyleft Workers World Service: Everyone is permitted to
>copy and distribute verbatim copies of this document, but
>changing it is not allowed. For more information contact
>Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011; via e-mail:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] For subscription info send message to:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.workers.org)
>
>
>
>
>
>Message-ID: <007301c02904$4c58f440$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>From: "WW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [WW]  Illusion & reality: What happens when imperialists get their way
>Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 00:26:40 -0400
>Content-Type: text/plain;
>        charset="iso-8859-1"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>-------------------------
>Via Workers World News Service
>Reprinted from the Oct. 5, 2000
>issue of Workers World newspaper
>-------------------------
>
>Illusion and reality
>
>WHAT HAPPENS WHEN IMPERIALISTS
>GET THEIR WAY
>
>By Deirdre Griswold
>
>What will it mean for the people of Yugoslavia if the U.S.
>and other imperialists get their way and break down that
>country's resistance?
>
>No one can have escaped the steady tide of propaganda meant
>to convince the world that life will be better if Yugoslavia
>gives up its struggle to remain independent of the
>imperialist world order and allows the bankers, investors
>and military strategists of the "West" to have their way.
>
>However, we don't have to imagine what would happen.
>Imperialist intervention, in many different forms, is
>nothing new. The United States, in particular, has
>intervened in other countries hundreds of times in the 20th
>century. Every time, there has been a loud propaganda
>campaign in the mass media to soften up the population at
>home and in the target country. Only the noblest motives
>have been claimed. Whether the intervention was covert or
>overt, by troops, CIA agents, or economic sanctions, it was
>always undertaken to "help" the people of the area.
>
>Many books have been written to show that just the opposite
>happened.
>
>Former Central Intelligence Agency and State Department
>officers like Philip Agee, William Blum and Ralph McGehee
>have exposed the murderous workings of the U.S. government's
>secret global police. They and author Michael Parenti have
>produced detailed chronicles of who, what, when and where
>Washington has carried out assassinations, invasions, covert
>operations and other forms of intervention to achieve its
>ends.
>
>What happens after a successful intervention? Does it bring
>improved material and political conditions for the people?
>If new, pro-U.S. leaders have been installed, are they
>crusaders for democracy, human rights and social justice?
>
>


_______________________________________________________

KOMINFORM
P.O. Box 66
00841 Helsinki - Finland
+358-40-7177941, fax +358-9-7591081
e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.kominf.pp.fi

_______________________________________________________

Kominform  list for general information.
Subscribe/unsubscribe  messages to

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Anti-Imperialism list for anti-imperialist news.

Subscribe/unsubscribe messages:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________________


Reply via email to