--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148310
Summary: msn connection crashes frequently
Product: kopete
Version: unspecified
On Saturday 28 July 2007, Matt Rogers wrote:
> There is a difference. I still think that Kopete should go in its own
> module, and would be happier to see it move to its own module rather
what would this gain kopete exactly? you can still do independant releases in
kdenetwork (with cmake that's n
On Jul 28, 2007, at 7:52 AM, Johann Ollivier Lapeyre wrote:
Everyone seems agree to move kopete to PIM (it is logical after
all). Is it possible to do that for KDE4.0? (thinking about
release calendar). Aaron?
I suppose I'm the only one that thinks Kopete should NOT move to
kdepi
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142877
--- Additional Comments From marco.robotangel googlemail com 2007-07-28
19:22 ---
I can confirm that.
Am Freitag, 27. Juli 2007 schrieb Roman Jarosz:
> Hi,
Hey,
> I've been working on Kopete status manager, the basic stuff (functional) is
> ready. Don't pay attention to some class names because this will change to
> something more consistent, and also I'll clean up the code. It's not
> polished b
Everyone seems agree to move kopete to PIM (it is logical after all). Is
it possible to do that for KDE4.0? (thinking about release calendar). Aaron?
___
kopete-devel mailing list
kopete-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-devel
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148264
--- Additional Comments From FrederikBraun web de 2007-07-28 14:25 ---
Oops :)
Thanks though, will forward
