Le mercredi 30 avril 2008, Chani a écrit :
> > > > (In case you wonder, by default, there is no custom displayname. the
> > > > nickname is displayed instead but would not be taken in account for
> > > > metacontact merging. That mean that two guys with the name nick would
> > > > not be in the sam
> > > (In case you wonder, by default, there is no custom displayname. the
> > > nickname is displayed instead but would not be taken in account for
> > > metacontact merging. That mean that two guys with the name nick would
> > > not be in the same metacontact)
>
> What if two differents people a
Le April 29 2008 13:53:04 Olivier Goffart, vous avez écrit :
> I still have that pending patch for few weeks now.
>
> - It remove the (useless) warning before deleting the old empty metacontact
> when you move contact to another metacontacts.
> - It merge automatically contact with the same custom
I still have that pending patch for few weeks now.
- It remove the (useless) warning before deleting the old empty metacontact
when you move contact to another metacontacts.
- It merge automatically contact with the same custom display name (if set)
into the same metacontact
As this is a beha
Olivier Goffart wrote:
> Hi.
>
> There is currently a discussion on the xmpp standard mailinglist about
> metacontact.
>
> Someone came with a complex specification to store metacontact link
> serverside.
>
> And another guy came with a very simple idea : two contact that are in the
> same gr
Hi.
There is currently a discussion on the xmpp standard mailinglist about
metacontact.
Someone came with a complex specification to store metacontact link
serverside.
And another guy came with a very simple idea : two contact that are in the
same group and have the same name are in the same
