Em Sunday 04 March 2012, Pali Rohár escreveu:
> On Sunday 26 February 2012 08:53:16 Lamarque V. Souza wrote:
> > Em Sunday 26 February 2012, Pali Rohár escreveu:
> > > But it is for cryptography plugin which is in extragear:
> > > http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/extragear/network/kopete-cryptography/
>
On Sunday 26 February 2012 08:53:16 Lamarque V. Souza wrote:
> Em Sunday 26 February 2012, Pali Rohár escreveu:
> > But it is for cryptography plugin which is in extragear:
> > http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/extragear/network/kopete-cryptography/
> >
> > Why is this plugin not in kopete trunk? I'm usi
Hi,
I'm suggesting to look at this patch:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id4113#c6
Patch from second comment is included in official Kubuntu release for a long
time, but in comment 6 (and 7) is written some info and new version of patch.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Desc
On Sunday 26 February 2012 09:00:28 Lamarque V. Souza wrote:
> Em Sunday 26 February 2012, Pali Rohár escreveu:
> > Hi, can be this patch commited also to stable 4.8 branch?
> > http://websvn.kde.org/?view=revision&revision82230
>
> Done:
>
> http://websvn.kde.org/?view=revision&revision822
Em Sunday 26 February 2012, Pali Rohár escreveu:
> Hi, can be this patch commited also to stable 4.8 branch?
> http://websvn.kde.org/?view=revision&revision=1282230
Done:
http://websvn.kde.org/?view=revision&revision=1282275
--
Lamarque V. Souza
KDE's Network Management maintainer
http
Em Sunday 26 February 2012, Pali Rohár escreveu:
> Hi,
Hi,
> here is another my review patch:
> https://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6768/
The patch seems ok.
> But it is for cryptography plugin which is in extragear:
> http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/extragear/network/kopete-cryptog
> > I'm trying to configure Kopete to work with Oracle Beehive
> > (Jabber/XMPP). When I try to connect I get a toaster notification that
> > says, "There was an error authenticating with the server. Login failed
> > with unknown reason."
For the jabber protocol, there exists a context menu "xml c
Hi, can be this patch commited also to stable 4.8 branch?
http://websvn.kde.org/?view=revision&revision82230
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
kopete-devel mailing list
kopete-dev
Hi,
here is another my review patch:
https://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6768/
But it is for cryptography plugin which is in extragear:
http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/extragear/network/kopete-cryptography/
Why is this plugin not in kopete trunk? I'm using it more years and I did not
see any problems.
to /dev/null :-)
> > And who is still active around Kopete development?
>
> Nobody.
>
> > On reviewboard https://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/groups/kopete/ we have more
> > usefull patches and some of them are without any comments.
>
> I know, last year I trie
Em Thursday 09 February 2012, Pali Rohár escreveu:
> Hi,
Hi,
> who is still reading kopete mailinglist?
Me :)
> And who is still active around Kopete development?
Nobody.
> On reviewboard https://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/groups/kopete/ we have more
>
Hi,
who is still reading kopete mailinglist?
And who is still active around Kopete development?
On reviewboard https://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/groups/kopete/ we have more
usefull patches and some of them are without any comments.
I think that we should look at contributed patches. And if they
esponse. Some of them are year old.
> > > Why is kopete reviewboard group without answer? Is then kopete still
> > > active?
> >
> > I guess it's just because there are very few people who actually work on
> > Kopete, and an even smaller number of those wa
On Friday, December 10, 2010, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> On Friday 10 December 2010 15:18:21 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > on reviewboard.kde.org we have a lot of patches/fixes for kopete
> > without response. Some of them are year old.
> > Why is
On Friday 10 December 2010 15:18:21 Pali Rohár wrote:
> Hello,
>
> on reviewboard.kde.org we have a lot of patches/fixes for kopete
> without response. Some of them are year old.
> Why is kopete reviewboard group without answer? Is then kopete still
> active?
I guess it's
Hello,
on reviewboard.kde.org we have a lot of patches/fixes for kopete
without response. Some of them are year old.
Why is kopete reviewboard group without answer? Is then kopete still active?
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
___
kopete-devel
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:35 AM, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Pi 16. Apríl 2010 06:05:26 you wrote:
>> On Tuesday, April 13, 2010 01:01:39 pm Pali Rohár wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I sent some patches to reviewboard last month, but without answer. Is
>&g
On Pi 16. Apríl 2010 06:05:26 you wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 13, 2010 01:01:39 pm Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I sent some patches to reviewboard last month, but without answer. Is
> > there any problems with these patches?
>
> silence means tacit a
On Tuesday, April 13, 2010 01:01:39 pm Pali Rohár wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I sent some patches to reviewboard last month, but without answer. Is there
> any problems with these patches?
silence means tacit approval. Just commit them.
--
Matt
__
Am Dienstag 13 April 2010 20:01:39 schrieb Pali Rohár:
> Hello,
>
> I sent some patches to reviewboard last month, but without answer. Is there
> any problems with these patches?
When I had patches for Kopete, I had to call for review several times.
I guess it's just the w
Hello,
I sent some patches to reviewboard last month, but without answer. Is there
any problems with these patches?
--
Pali Rohár
pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
kopete-devel mailing
Maybe that's an opportunity to implement
http://blog.fishsoup.net/2009/09/23/splinter-patch-review/ on top of Bugzilla
Am Sonntag 08 November 2009 12:11:58 schrieb David Solbach:
> Dear Reviewboard-Users,
>
> Unfortunately I had to disable the user registration because we h
Dear Reviewboard-Users,
Unfortunately I had to disable the user registration because we had a lot of
nonsense accounts created by spammers. Until we have installed a captcha
system or similar measures, all new accounts have to be requested via
bugs.kde.org . There is a component "Review
Hi everybody!
Kopete has a review group in reviewboard.kde.org and patches that
would normally be sent to the list need to be posted there. We'll
still get the mail on the list that there's a patch to review and then
your patches don't get lost when somebody (usually me *blush*) says
they'll commi
24 matches
Mail list logo
