Martin,While this is a disortation that follows some logic it is flawed in that
the result should be 0 slop in the attach points. And backing into a reason to
have slop is not the way to go. I have 0 movement and am able to pick the tire
off the ground from the wing tip. I have not found any oth
On 5/20/2011 6:15 AM, Patrick and Robin Russo wrote:
> Now if you have a new and improved design for wing attach fittings, put
> it on the table. Many of us think that there is room for change there.
If I were to make any change to the WAF, and it would be mostly for
those who need to remove and
On 5/19/2011 6:12 PM, Dan Heath wrote:
> I built my own using fiberglass and silicone. While they are nice, they
> will not keep the form, so I am always having to bend them in when I put the
> top back on. I won't make that mistake again.
>
If I put some small formers at intervals on the side o
Netters,
I posted the message below two years ago on the Corvair site. Today the
AOPA has posted a similar discussion. Good information..
http://www.aopa.org/training/articles/2011/110519impossible_turn_practice.html?WT.mc_id=110520epilot&WT.mc_sect=tts
(I do not know if a login is required)
f
Wow Martin, after that dissertation I wouldn't dare make a comment! It is
much like saying 2 plus 2 equals 4, does anyone want to refute this or make
comment? My answer remains the same to your original question regarding
wing tip movement. There should be NONE when you have finished installing
5 matches
Mail list logo
