Does the word "thief" come to mind?  If you want to build a plane that's 
legaly (sic) considered to be not a KR aircraft", then (a) buy plans for
another "legaly. . .not a KR aircraft", (b) design your own based on a
balsawood kit, or (c), PAY JANNETTE FOR A SET OF PLANS AND STOP TRYING TO
FIND WAYS TO CHISEL HER OUT OF THE COST FOR THE PLANS.  The company is her's
now, has been for quite a few years, and since ONE set of plans is to build
ONE aircraft as stated in the plans package, either build something other
than the KR entirely or pay her for her plans.  This is not rocket science!

Gene Leone, Worland, Wyoming

"Whatever else history may say about me when I’m gone, I hope it will record
that I appealed to your best hopes, not your worst fears; to your confidence
rather than your doubts. My dream is that you will travel the road ahead
with liberty’s lamp guiding your steps and opportunity’s arm steadying your
way." - Ronald Reagan

-------Original Message-------

From: KRnet
List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org
Date: 08/19/04 06:00:00
To: kr...@mylist.net
Subject: @WL RE: KR> Plan #'s

Not being a lawyer I do not know for sure but it would seem to me that if a
plan is used to build a second airplane and there are many modifications as
there are on almost all KR aircraft built, then it's not a KR but the plans
were used as a guide for only a part of the building. What percentage of
deviation form the plans would have to be made in order to have the aircraft
legaly considered to be not a KR aircraft. Some of you guys who are lawyers,
please coment on this.



Bob Stone, Harker Heights, Tx

rsto...@hot.rr.com



-------Original Message-------



From: KRnet

List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org
Date: 08/19/04 06:48:18

To: KRnet

Subject: RE: KR> Plan #'s



The Plan # is the serial number starting from day one when the plans were
put on the market. That is also your proof number if the FAA wants to check
back with RR that you have a legal set of plans. You are authorized to build
one KR using that set of plans and no more than one. It's in the copy write
laws and it is FAA policy to enforce this. If your FSDO checks on this, may
be another matter. The Book Number is the update version. So, if you have a
Book No. 82, that is the revision 82 edition. I got this info from personal
conversation with Jeannette Rand.



Sid Wood

Tri-gear KR-2 N6242

Mechanicsville, MD USA

sidney.w...@titan.com









>I am looking at my builders book and realized that I do not fully know

>what the hand scribed numbers at the top right of my book mean.

>On top is "# 6123" and on the bottom is "book 59". Does anyone

>have the correct meaning of the top number.



This is only an educated guess, but it is my understanding that RR

keeps the name and address of the original plans purchaser (and

possibly any known secondary) in notebooks in numerical sequence.

Since they are over 10K on the KR-2 / 2S that makes for a lot of

books. My basic KR-2 S/N is 9707, "Master File Book No.82".



Allen G. Wiesner KR-2SS/TD S/N 1118

65 Franklin Street

Ansonia, CT 06401-1240



(203) 732-0508



flash...@usadatanet.net









_______________________________________

to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net

please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html


_______________________________________
to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html

Reply via email to