I agree it "feels" much different when actually flying it. I think Cessna may
have reported this by calculation as opposed to actual measured numbers. Too
many times I have climbed near 8,000 feet and found myself down to 300-400 foot
per minute climb rate at Vx! I was trying to keep from pul
Rod Machado's books say that you will lose 3%/1000 ft.
At 08:54 AM 11/13/2004 -0600, you wrote:
>At 07:37 AM 11/13/04 -0600, you wrote:
> >
> >
> > According to the Cessna pilot handbooks of operation for the common 152,
> >172 variety, the normally aspirated avaition engines seem to lose roughly
According to the Cessna pilot handbooks of operation for the common 152,
172 variety, the normally aspirated avaition engines seem to lose roughly
about 1% of horsepower per 1,000 feet of increase in altitude.
>Colin & Bev Rainey
+++
Col
According to the Cessna pilot handbooks of operation for the common 152,
172 variety, the normally aspirated avaition engines seem to lose roughly
about 1% of horsepower per 1,000 feet of increase in altitude.
>Colin & Bev Rainey
+++
Co
At 07:37 AM 11/13/04 -0600, you wrote:
>
>
> According to the Cessna pilot handbooks of operation for the common 152,
>172 variety, the normally aspirated avaition engines seem to lose roughly
>about 1% of horsepower per 1,000 feet of increase in altitude.
>>Colin & Bev Rainey
>+
krnet-bounces+brian.kraut=engalt@mylist.net
[mailto:krnet-bounces+brian.kraut=engalt@mylist.net]On Behalf Of
larry flesner
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 8:23 AM
To: KRnet
Subject: KR> lost power up high
According to the Cessna pilot handbooks of operation for the common 152,
172
6 matches
Mail list logo